93gilmour93
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2010
- 20,469
- 25,034
Welcome to Capitslism! Wealthy markets to the left where champagne and caviar will be served upon seating. Poor markets to the right where you will find the paperwork releasing your team to a wealthy market, along with a minor league application. Oh, and a flyer entitled, "Orlando Thanks You!"Small market fans just fell to their knees
Makes the Rantanen trade look bad. If he was willing to take what 13$? That's a steal with these projections.
If you consider it a problem that 1/4 of the league has missed the playoffs over the last 5 years, I don’t see how striving for a cap that’s “higher than half the teams are willing to spend” would improve parity?
Yep the NFL method, is non guaranteed contracts.NBA teams have a much more fair and flexible salary cap that allows teams to spend their way out of bad situations. The NFL has very flexible contract and cap rules allowing teams more strategies st their disposal to make the cap work for them when they need it to to get out of bad situations and extend good ones.
just my speculation, but this seems to indicate a big pay day for Canadian TV rights.
Is hockey the only sport where paying someone 13 million a year is considered 'stealing' their services by the fans?
3. A rising tide lifts all boats, so while this may free up some potentially huge superstar trades, the salaries of the middlin' players will similarly go up and it will be just as difficult to build a balanced team.
NFL trades mostly limited to dumping guys at the TDL.Yep the NFL method, is non guaranteed contracts.
The NBA the roster is half the size.
It's a business and in terms of this business with a rising cap $13 mil for his services would be below his market value. I also think we have our priorities mixed up when we are paying people this much to play a game, but that's capitalism.
But paying 'below market value' does not translate to an organization 'stealing' a player's services.
Consider it this way - if you meet a veteran, big name hockey player the last thing you would want to do is tell them that their contract is a 'steal'. Why? It implies they are not being fairly compensated for their services and that the player and their agent agreed to sign an contract that doesn't fairly compensate them and is grossly lopsided in favor of the organization. Why would good players whose services are coveted around the league agree to sign a long term contract that 'steals' their services and doesn't compensate them fairly? Answer: they wouldn't and they didn't.
If someone pays 10% below market value for a vehicle they aren't going to describe the circumstances as 'stealing' the vehicle from the dealership. But for some reason when it comes to players signing for as little as 5-10% below their expected contract value - fans insist on using the term 'steal' to describe that context (which I find to be strange and inaccurate).