We need some consistency, pick one and stick to it....willie said:Best solution:
No World Cup in 2008.
NHLers in 2010 Olympics.
Restart the World Cup in 2012 or 2014 for every 4 years.
For the Olympics, every 4 years you 'cancel' the WJC and let the WJC teams duke it out for the Olympics.
Market the future.
Blind Gardien said:
willie said:Best solution:
No World Cup in 2008.
NHLers in 2010 Olympics.
Restart the World Cup in 2012 or 2014 for every 4 years.
For the Olympics, every 4 years you 'cancel' the WJC and let the WJC teams duke it out for the Olympics.
Market the future.
Well, technically, they (the IIHF) can force anything. For the Summer Olympics, FIFA has made it an Under-23 event (with 1 or 2 over-age expections).TinCanCommunications said:How in the world can you FORCE it to be a World Juniors Tournament?
If a 27 year old wants to play, why shouldn't he play?
Why shouldn't a country to be able to field it's best possible team for hockey when it does that in virtually every other sport?....
TinCanCommunications said:How in the world can you FORCE it to be a World Juniors Tournament?
Jazz said:No doubt that move was done so the Olympics would not compete with their World Cup. But hockey does not have a 'world' recognized World Cup (it is only given importance in Canada, Sweden and Finland) like soccer does...
Yes, of course, everthing can be developed....but how long would it take to match the appeal and the reach of the Olympics? A couple of decades at least....why waste that time when we can go ahead with the Olympics and grow even further from there?willie said:Sure right now it isn't. But it can be marketed and developed as such. As it stands, Europeans place a huge amount of emphasis on the World Championships.
Why not, every fourth year, delay the world championships until after the NHL season is over and then have the World "Cup" with every team's best players. A few players who go deep in the playoffs will have to grind it out but that is a small minority. (and since it is clear the NHLPA - and the NHL for that matter - do not like the current format, this would probably be more agreeable to the NHLPA)
WCJr said:Agree completley.
The World Cup is a far superior tournament.![]()
Tadite said:To heck with all these glorified exhabition games. Not worth the time or the money.
You want to have useless games like this? Send college kids or minro leaguers. Not people who are actually important to their teams.
Jazz said:I'm sorry, I can only equate that with narrow-minded and inward thinking.
How can promoting the game (via the Olympics) to a wider world audience not be good for the NHL? What if hockey becomes more interesting to fans around the world after seeing world-class action...what if they start taking part in their countries national program....then we have a wider area to eventually draw more NHL players from. Have you not seen the increased international flavor of basketball since the NBA started going to the Olympics? Well it could even be more-so for the NHL.
I am not even factoring increased jersey sales worldwide and things like that....
There is more to the hockey world than North America...![]()
TinCanCommunications said:Wow.
Not sure why. But Americans seem to be most opposed to it.
Course, of all the major countries in the Olympic Hockey, Americans care least about the sport.
joshjull said:Are saying American hockey fans care the least about it? I would say that isn't the case. Americans as a whole you are probably right. But we have more hockey fans in this country than many of our opponents have citizens.
King Ryan said:Really, what makes the Olympics any less "meaningful" than the NHL?
All sports are meaningless.