NHL/hockey TV ratings 2024-25

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
In the first round U.S. markets have co-exist regional broadcasts that cut into the national numbers. So when it's a Canadian team that's one (or two if CAN v CAN) less option(s) to not be watching the U.S. national broadcast. So it's more about how far they advance, but where it's really made up and why I'm always harping on "two country league" and think/wish Canadian numbers were more available/shared (even by the league) is that the numbers up north increase when a Canadian team is playing. And they increase significantly over U.S. v. U.S..

Stanley Cup Playoff numbers should really operate on "North American audience" but a long history, particularly from U.S. sports/sports business media, of ignoring that Canada exists and that it's a two country league. That there's national broadcast rights in both countries. They know they get more clicks/comment/article shares for blanket "NHL ratings are down" headlines and/or "[insert series does poor #]" (meaning solely in the U.S. which they never notate) so it wouldn't surprise me if that's coming for any of those potential games involving Canadian teams but it'll be usual uneducated nonsense, unless any given series does poor numbers on both sides of the border. Which is possible any given season with certain U.S. v. U.S. matchups but less likely when a CAN team is involved -- about worse you can get is the Jets getting 1.0M in CAN and a weak 250-350k in the U.S.. Of course that's only reported as 250-350k because that sells better than 1.3M actual average audience in the NHL footprint.
Let's say Leafs v Canadians second round should draw decent now Jets v Canucks first round very likely not
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reaser
From my conversations, and I'll note it wasn't explicitly stated, but I got the impression that both U.S. rights holders will be counting the 4 Nations numbers in their "regular season average viewership." A pseudo-standard, we've seen it in the past with the ASG.

I'm not particularly in favor of that, don't like when the ASG is counted either, because what everyone interested wants to see is the actual regular season games average and obviously the general public that doesn't know any better assumes that's what the numbers reflect. That's not how the networks think, though. Similarly, we'll see the typical [poor avg viewership number] couple games unilaterally just not counted in their season average. Which I'm also on-record as being wholly against when it's been done in the past -- including last season.

Regardless, if it plays out like that and as of right now that's my assumption, when they post the season averages at the end of the regular season it'll look better than some are thinking.

Something that's stood out to me, is the floor, which the previous two seasons no games went below 150k, that had become/was becoming essentially the worst we'd see, one game that did 'really bad'. We've already seen four games below 150k this season.

And on below or sub-200k games. Last season there was 8 such games. Two seasons ago there was 13 games sub-200k. To-date, there's been 13 games this season below 200k, with of course some regular season broadcasts left to go.

A lot of that is the typical poor scheduling. Naturally all 13 games have been in late time slots, that'll happen but the poor scheduling had added to that number.

13 sub-200k games so far:
ESPN 9pmET: 1
ESPN 10pmET: 2
TNT 9pmET: 1
TNT 9:30pmET: 2
TNT 10pmET: 7

Kings and Utah are tied with the most, of 4 each. That's typical for the Kings as I've pointed out over the years. Utah, new team, hasn't translated to drawing well in national broadcasts. Where it gets to "bad scheduling" is next is the Panthers being in 3 of those games. An ETZ team in the late games. Including the insanely scheduled CTZ v. ETZ late game I've pointed out a few times where the Wild were blacked out locally.

Of the 13 least-viewed games so far this season, 4 have had an ETZ team in the late game. 3 have had a CTZ team in the late game. One was CTZ v. ETZ so 6 of the 13 games were CTZ/ETZ in the late game. 2 of those 13 were non-exclusive games, which again is a bad job of putting together the U.S. national broadcast schedule. Not a bad job (imo they should be shown) but just for the info, 3 of the 13 least-viewed games included a Canadian team.

With just minimal effort put into the national broadcast schedule, specifically in this case, the late games, you'd be looking more at half the amount of games under 200k to this point so far this season, rather than the 13 and potentially counting.
 
-NHL on TNT avg viewership Sunday-

*Golden Knights-Red Wings: 405k
-TNT: 337k
--truTV: 68k

*Stars-Avalanche: 301k
-TNT: 255k
--truTV: 46k

*non-exclusive games
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greatzsky 99
(via @jheaps4)

NHL on ABC:

January:

Rangers-Capitals: 1.1M
Rangers-Blackhawks: 454k
Bruins - Panthers 1,05M


February:

Blackhawks-Panthers: 723k
Rangers-Bruins: 1.1M
Lightning-Red Wings: 934k
Golden Knights-Bruins: 1.27M
Capitals-Penguins 1.1M
Wild-Red Wings 944k

March:

Bruins-Penguins: 1.1M
Kraken-Flyers: 580k
Bruins-Lightning: 777k
Devils-Penguins: 604k


Cable:

October:

Blues-Kraken: 348k (ESPN)
Bruins-Panthers: 790k (ESPN, non-exclusive)
Blackhawks-Utah: 522k (ESPN)
Rangers-Penguins: 467k (TNT+truTV)
Avalanche-Golden Knights 315k (TNT+truTV)
Wild-Blues: 417k (ESPN)
Flyers-Oilers: 333k (ESPN)
Sabres-Penguins: 512k (TNT+truTV)
Bruins-Avalanche: 340k (TNT+truTV)
Capitals-Flyers: 477k (ESPN)
Avalanche-Kraken: 422k (ESPN)
Kings-Golden Knights: 245k (ESPN)
Flyers-Capitals: 410k (TNT+truTV)
Rangers-Capitals: 412k (ESPN)
Kings-Sharks: 186k (ESPN)
Golden Knights-Kings: 109k (TNT+truTV)

November:

Red Wings-Blackhawks: 411k (TNT+truTV)
Red Wings-Penguins: 354k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Kings-Avalanche 231k (TNT+truTV)
Hurricanes-Flyers: 237k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Predators-Kraken: 155k (TNT+truTV)
Capitals-Lightning: 268k (TNT)
Golden Knights-Avalanche: 207k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Penguins-Bruins: 483k (TNT+truTV)
Avalanche-Stars: 177k (TNT+truTV)

December:

Bruins-Blackhawks: 487k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Stars-Kings: 232k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Rangers-Sabres 478k (TNT+truTV)
Flyers-Red Wings 418k (TNT+truTV)
Panthers-Wild 161k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Blackhawks-Sabres: 245k (ESPN2)
Avalanche-Utah: 258k (ESPN2)
Stars-Blackhawks: 217k (ESPN)
Blues-Blackhawks: 920k (Winter Classic, TNT+truTV)

January:

Avalanche-Blackhawks 283k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Panthers - Utah 183k (TNT)
Red Wings-Panthers: 507k (ESPN)
Oilers-Avalanche 389k (ESPN)
Hurricanes-Sabres: 259k (TNT+truTV)
Oilers-Wild: 324k (TNT+truTV)
Panthers-Kings: 151k (TNT+truTV)
Golden Knights-Stars: 424k (ESPN)
Flyers-Devils: 253k (TNT+truTV)
Penguins-Utah: 138k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)

February:

Sharks-Kraken: 175k (ESPN)
Bruins-Rangers: 537k (TNT+truTV)
Oilers-Blackhawks: 217k (TNT+truTV)
Rangers-Penguins 560k (TNT+truTV)
Oilers-Capitals 318k (TNT+truTV)
Canucks-Kings: 159k (TNT+truTV)

March:

Leafs-Penguins: 326k (TNT+truTV)
Bruins-Wild: 457k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Blues-Stars: 383k (TNT+truTV)
Red Wings-Blue Jackets 1.6M (ESPN, Stadium Series)
Capitals-Rangers: 324k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Leafs-Golden Knights: 178k (TNT+truTV)
Sabres-Lightning: 390k (ESPN)
Sharks-Avalanche: 305k (ESPN)
Devils-Flyers: 263k (TNT+truTV)
Penguins-Wild: 350k TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Sabres-Red Wings: 290k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Ducks-Utah: 139k (TNT+truTV)
Utah-Oilers: 147k (ESPN)
Golden Knights-Red Wings: 405k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Stars-Avalanche: 301k (TNT+truTV, non-exclusive)
Avalanche-Leafs: 319k (TNT)
Kraken-Wild: 190k (TNT, non-exclusive)
 
Last edited:
@Coinneach, for your list, the Avalanche-Leafs game, and the Kraken-Wild game (when we get that #, wasn't on my list so have to wait until someone else gets it or I'll see it next week) those games were TNT only, no truTV simulcast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coinneach
Hasnt this been a problem? That they didnt show Panthers game?

ABC changing stations in Miami​

The Miami television station WPLG (“Local 10”) is losing its ABC affiliation as of August 3 after the sides were unable to come to a deal, it was announced Thursday. ABC programming will shift to a digital subchannel of the market’s FOX affiliate WSVN, owned by Sunbeam Television.

WPLG, owned since 2014 by a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, had been an ABC affiliate for nearly 70 years.
 
Hasnt this been a problem? That they didnt show Panthers game?

ABC changing stations in Miami​

The Miami television station WPLG (“Local 10”) is losing its ABC affiliation as of August 3 after the sides were unable to come to a deal, it was announced Thursday. ABC programming will shift to a digital subchannel of the market’s FOX affiliate WSVN, owned by Sunbeam Television.

WPLG, owned since 2014 by a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, had been an ABC affiliate for nearly 70 years.

A problem, yes, wasn't about Panthers games it was that they didn't show the early games for "ABC Hockey Saturdays." So a 1pmET and 3:30pmET ABC DH, they'd show game shows/nature show programming and the 3:30pmET game, not showing the 1pmET game. Didn't just apply to the NHL, they didn't show other sports in similar time slot. Been an issue for years. I frequently mentioned it on my twitter/X -as well as this news a few days ago- so this change increases the odds of those games/sports being shown in market on the new ABC affiliate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greatzsky 99
A problem, yes, wasn't about Panthers games it was that they didn't show the early games for "ABC Hockey Saturdays." So a 1pmET and 3:30pmET ABC DH, they'd show game shows/nature show programming and the 3:30pmET game, not showing the 1pmET game. Didn't just apply to the NHL, they didn't show other sports in similar time slot. Been an issue for years. I frequently mentioned it on my twitter/X -as well as this news a few days ago- so this change increases the odds of those games/sports being shown in market on the new ABC affiliate.
Yes thanks, this what i was thinking about
found this on Wikipedia, seems to have with this situation.

WPLG occasionally preempts lower tier ESPN on ABC programming in order to fulfill its weekly educational and informational mandate to the FCC. Preempted sports telecasts are occasionally cleared on the station's third subchannel (which normally carries Heroes & Icons); however, these programs are also made available on the ESPN app or ESPN+ (which simulcasts most live sporting events on ABC) regardless.
 
WPLG occasionally preempts lower tier ESPN on ABC programming in order to fulfill its weekly educational and informational mandate to the FCC.

E/I is used as an excuse by poorly ran stations.

This is the same station that preempted NBA FInals pregame shows to show their own, which was horrible. Same station that cut away from the Panthers Stanley Cup winning postgame coverage mid-interview to goto commercial and come back with their own news program.

Plus the ton of sports, not just hockey, that they didn't show because they knew better. E/I isn't the reason, it's the excuse. Lot of self-importance there. Being an independent makes a lot more sense when you think your programming is more important/popular than the programming you're supposed to be airing as an affiliate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greatzsky 99

Ad

Ad