NHL/hockey TV ratings 2024-25

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
You'd think this would be a discussion point with their whole 4 Nations experiment of lengthening TV timeouts (Commercial breaks) but shortening intermissions.

More likely to hold an audience over a longer commercial than over a 16 minute intermission.

I'd love to see this chart for the championship game.

@Fenway posted a thread on the main board on how even back in the 1950s TV execs didn’t like hockey as a TV sport because of the two intermissions. He even posted research that two intermissions cuts down the viewing audience more than halftime in football and basketball. I do think in the next 15-20 years if they can perfect synthetic ice on NHL arenas that going to 3 periods to 2 halves or 4 quarters will be a thing. But in the meantime longer breaks and shorter intermission may hold audiences in the short term.
 
@Fenway posted a thread on the main board on how even back in the 1950s TV execs didn’t like hockey as a TV sport because of the two intermissions. He even posted research that two intermissions cuts down the viewing audience more than halftime in football and basketball. I do think in the next 15-20 years if they can perfect synthetic ice on NHL arenas that going to 3 periods to 2 halves or 4 quarters will be a thing. But in the meantime longer breaks and shorter intermission may hold audiences in the short term.
Shortening intermissions is a bad idea, they lengthened them in the past, because there was still wet ice to start the periods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
Shortening intermissions is a bad idea, they lengthened them in the past, because there was still wet ice to start the periods.

It's not a bad idea if you cut out some of the bullshit before the actual resurfacing.

Only about half of the intermission is resurfacing. The other half is random "Games" used as a mask for a sponsorship plug.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad