NHL/hockey TV ratings 2024-25

Coinneach

Registered User
Feb 1, 2014
1,301
770
Czech Republic
NHL TV ratings 2024/25
(via @jheaps4)

October:

Blues-Kraken: 348k (ESPN)
Bruins-Panthers: 790k (ESPN, non-exclusive)
Blackhawks-Utah: 522k (ESPN)
Rangers-Penguins: 467k (TNT+truTV)
Avalanche-Golden Knights 315k (TNT+truTV)
Wild-Blues: 417k (ESPN)
Flyers-Oilers: 333k (ESPN)
Sabres-Penguins: 512k (TNT+truTV)
Bruins-Avalanche: 340k (TNT+truTV)
Capitals-Flyers: 477k (ESPN)
Avalanche-Kraken: 422k (ESPN)
Kings-Golden Knights: 245k (ESPN)
Flyers-Capitals: 410k (TNT+truTV)
Rangers-Capitals: 412k (ESPN)
Kings-Sharks: 186k (ESPN)
Golden Knights-Kings: 109k (TNT+truTV)

November:

Red Wings-Blackhawks: 411k (TNT+truTV)
Red Wings-Penguins: 354k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Kings-Avalanche 231k (TNT+truTV)
Hurricanes-Flyers: 237k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Predators-Kraken: 155k (TNT+truTV)
Capitals-Lightning: 268k (TNT)
Golden Knights-Avalanche: 207k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Penguins-Bruins: 483k (TNT+truTV)
Avalanche-Stars: 177k (TNT+truTV)

December:

Bruins-Blackhawks: 487k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Stars-Kings: 232k (TNT, non-exclusive)
Rangers-Sabres 478k (TNT+truTV)
 
Last edited:

DaBadGuy7

Registered User
Dec 28, 2004
2,642
1,403
Newark,NJ
-NHL on TNT avg viewership Wednesday-

Rangers-Sabres did 406k on TNT. Don't have the truTV simulcast # yet, will update when available (probably next week.)

Wednesday’s Rangers-Sabres NHL regular season game averaged 478,000 viewers across TNT and truTV, down 11% from a non-exclusive Bruins-Devils game last season (538K). The Rangers’ win nonetheless ranks as the fourth most-watched NHL game on TNT Sports this season, with three of the four most-watched games this season airing in the past three weeks.
 

Coinneach

Registered User
Feb 1, 2014
1,301
770
Czech Republic

Wednesday’s Rangers-Sabres NHL regular season game averaged 478,000 viewers across TNT and truTV, down 11% from a non-exclusive Bruins-Devils game last season (538K). The Rangers’ win nonetheless ranks as the fourth most-watched NHL game on TNT Sports this season, with three of the four most-watched games this season airing in the past three weeks.

Those MLS CUP numbers are pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: S E P H and Reaser

Chileiceman

Registered User
Dec 14, 2004
10,026
874
Toronto
Yea that MLS Apple deal was a test if the other major leagues would take the plunge and do an all streaming deal and so far this was been a disaster. I think the NFL is the only league that could take that risk.
The problem with their idea was that it was not enough to subscribe to Apple TV to watch your local team play. You had to subscribe and then get an additional package on top of it. I think had the package come included with every Apple TV subscription, it would have driven interest. Instead they made it so only die-hards would go along with it. A shortsighted decision IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet

Chileiceman

Registered User
Dec 14, 2004
10,026
874
Toronto
The problem with their idea was that it was not enough to subscribe to Apple TV to watch your local team play. You had to subscribe and then get an additional package on top of it. I think had the package come included with every Apple TV subscription, it would have driven interest. Instead they made it so only die-hards would go along with it. A shortsighted decision IMO.
On queue here is some good analysis on that topic https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2024/12/mls-apple-impact-ratings-rights-deal-exposure/
 

Kirk Van Houten

Registered User
May 7, 2019
1,515
1,653
Yea that MLS Apple deal was a test if the other major leagues would take the plunge and do an all streaming deal and so far this was been a disaster. I think the NFL is the only league that could take that risk.
An all streaming deal could work but not an all in one streaming service deal or at least that's what the MLS is showing thus far we'll see after the World Cup and if Messi ever plays in the MLS Cup game how the numbers move.
 

varsaku

Registered User
Feb 14, 2014
2,694
923
United States
The problem with their idea was that it was not enough to subscribe to Apple TV to watch your local team play. You had to subscribe and then get an additional package on top of it. I think had the package come included with every Apple TV subscription, it would have driven interest. Instead they made it so only die-hards would go along with it. A shortsighted decision IMO.

You can view games with just MLS season pass without needing Apple TV subscription. However, Apple TV subscription allows you to view a few selected games a week without needing MLS season pass. The problem is that you need one of the two subscriptions to view games blocking out a lot of fans. This could have been resolved by making one or two games a week free to watch but I am sure Apple wanted it behind one of the two subscriptions options to drive subscriptions.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad