I have maintained from the beginning that if they're going to do this, Austin is a better market. Being the only big four team in a huge and rapidly expanding market has to be more valuable than being a fifth priority in Houston
I agree that the arena will and should be the number one decider, but as I alluded to in an earlier post I think Austin actually checks a lot of boxes of some of the NHL's most successful expansions/relocations (Vegas, Columbus, Nashville, Raleigh). Be first to medium but growing markets rather than fourth or fifth to bigger onesBipolar, from the sound of things.
I have to think this is "we want Houston, and Austin is a fine plan B if we can't get an arena deal secured."
The Atlanta thing seems like it has become a mess based on the ongoing thread, and is a case of no news being bad news. It’ll get there but there’s a difference between wanting to be serious and actually being serious. It’s waiting for who emerges.If Houston, I'm curious on the arena plan. I can't see the team being a tennant in the Toyota Center.
Could they add both? Interesting Atlanta is not mentioned
The most interesting thing to me about this is who the owners are. It really signals to me that the NHL does not believe Krause or the NYL group have the money in Atlanta
Bettman has just taken a more significant public stance on Houston/Austin than he has on Atlanta.I don't see how you infer anything about Atlanta's finances from today's news. That might be so about Krause, who we haven't heard anything from in a long while, but the competing North Point Mall redevelopment proposal is fully on track for final city approval in August. Jamestown is not going through all of these public meetings and an imminent city vote for nothing. There's 0% chance they would put their neck out there if they didn't have the wherewithal to meet the league's criteria.
Games would resemble those in Toronto IMOAustin would be very NHL expansion in a good way
It’s because there’s names we can put to in Atlanta, so them not being named here is surprising because of the consciousness.I don't see how you infer anything about Atlanta's finances from today's news. That might be so about Krause, who we haven't heard anything from in a long while, but the competing North Point Mall redevelopment proposal is fully on track for final city approval in August. Jamestown is not going through all of these public meetings and an imminent city vote for nothing. There's 0% chance they would put their neck out there if they didn't have the wherewithal to meet the league's criteria.
I don’t think it has to be a backup depending on if another group is around. Austin is large enough that it doesn’t have to be one or the other nor should it be.Bettman has just taken a more significant public stance on Houston/Austin than he has on Atlanta.
As markets, they are very comparable in terms of how badly the NHL wants to be there and if anything I'd have Atlanta a little ahead there. We know that Atlanta is way ahead in a potential arena, which is key issue #2 for expansion. By process of elimination that leaves ownership/the fee. It is the one thing that makes sense to me as an explanation for why Houston seems to be further along without getting into borderline conspiracy theories.
ETA to consolidate everything to this thread:
There's no guarantee that the new Texas team will be playing at an existing arena in Houston, and as much as I agree with the idea that Austin is probably a backup plan it is still a backup plan that Bettman announced publicly that requires an arena that is further behind than either of the two projects in Atlanta. Both of which once again signal to me that the TX group has the money and the ATL groups don't (or do but aren't willing to pay)
I think "backup" is probably ungenerous but as much as I am pro-Austin I would assume the league and the mystery ownership group probably see Houston as the primary.I don’t think it has to be a backup depending on if another group is around. Austin is large enough that it doesn’t have to be one or the other nor should it be.
Like I said, if you see the Atlanta thread there, you’ll see why. They will happily go there if the people there sort their shit out. There’s people there who were overconfident in where they stood, which is why they tried rushing to the front a few years ago hoping they were Bettman’s preferred group. That’s not how Gary works though.I think "backup" is probably ungenerous but as much as I am pro-Austin I would assume the league and the mystery ownership group probably see Houston as the primary.
Either way, the fact that they're going public with it and still haven't necessarily decided on the exact city once again causes me to raise my eyebrow about Atlanta
Houston is notorious for not having zoning laws, so it's not an issue of building the place, but a matter of where you can build it. If they build it too far away from major population centers, that could affect the fanbase and you'd need the team to be really good right away to get fans to show up.If Houston, I'm curious on the arena plan. I can't see the team being a tennant in the Toyota Center.
Could they add both? Interesting Atlanta is not mentioned