News & Notes XLIV: Revenge of the Seth

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,325
52,500
Winston-Salem NC
I was just in Myrtle Beach for Thanksgiving, and there were a lot of New York plates around. It's not the natives driving that, it's the snowbirds, and the snowbirds are much more likely to follow hockey.
not wrong, though Boris's point still VERY much stands for WV. Northern WV is explicitly Pens country if you follow hockey, and the rest of the state is a mix of Caps, Pens, and even Canes and Jackets fans with the occasional fan of whoever's hot (usually Wings or Devils when I was there). The only Rangers fans I ever saw there were students that wanted to get TF out of New York for college or that couldn't get into one of the better NYC area schools so they went to WVU or Marshall. And those were usually VASTLY out-numbered by Pens, Flyers, and Caps fan students from PA, MD, and VA.
 
Last edited:

TheBigLetowski

Registered User
Jul 31, 2016
262
594
Once again, let's put the facts out there.

From start of the season through the Columbus game here are some key metrics:

5v5:
CF%: KK was ranked 13 out of 13 Canes forwards
xGF%: KK was ranked 11th out of 13 Canes forwards.
GA/60: KK was ranked 10th out of 13 Canes forwards.
GF%: KK was ranked 7th out of 13 Canes forwards (due to Necas high SH%)
HDCA: KK was ranked 11th out of 13 Canes forward.
HDCF%: KK was ranked 12th out of 13 forwards.
OISH%: KK was ranked 1st (due to Necas high SH%)
Offensive zone starts%: KK was ranked 2nd most (Necas and Robinson 1 and 3)
Defensive Zone starts / 60: KK was ranked 12th (Necas and Robinson 11th, 13th)

Also, he had the worst FO% at 49.7% of any center during this time.

His line faced the weakest competition with favorable ozone starts and other than Necas's high SH%, didn't have good metrics.

Again, I don't think Drury is any better so I have no problem putting KK back there, but he was riding the coat-tails of Necas's high SH%.
I'm going to steal this to argue the KK hive on Twitter/X
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
26,006
94,374
I think it just goes to show Kooch is at both his best and his worst when he turns off his brain. On high danger chances when you just have to go based on instinct and reflexes, he's best in the league. When its a routine shot, he is a space cadet.

Maybe give him a little aderall to keep his mind focused!
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,844
144,899
Bojangles Parking Lot
I fail to believe that the rags are the most popular team in SC. Or WV. I grew up on the border of WV and VA and there isnt a single f***ing thing people in WV find redeeming about NY, and I never saw a single piece of rangers gear the there to this day when I go home (wife is from WV).

The near same could be said about SC. This map is pretty much horse shit lol.

Perhaps the area has changed. Similar data-centric map shows a strong Yankees following along the VA/WV border.

4_3_hd.png


Also a couple of counties going Knicks-Orange in this NBA map.

Vivid-Seats-pano_405441.jpg


And so not surprisingly, a couple of Jets/Giants counties as well

4_3_hd.png



Absent a better explanation, I would hypothesize that this doesn’t necessarily reflect NYC teams having the predominant fanbase in the area, but being perhaps the largest fanbase in a transitional zone where for example the Pens/Jackets/Caps might be splitting a county into small fragments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chrispy and DaveG

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,654
40,384
not wrong, though Boris's point still VERY much stands for WV. Northern WV is explicitly Pens country if you follow hockey, and the rest of the state is a mix of Caps, Pens, and even Canes and Jackets fans with the occasional fan of whoever's hot (usually Wings or Devils when I was there). The only Rangers fans I ever saw there were students that wanted to get TF out of New York for college or that couldn't get into one of the better NYC area schools so they went to WVU or Marshall. And those were usually VASTLY out-numbered by Pens, Flyers, and Caps fan students from PA, MD, and VA.
Yeah but if they are natives they don't know how to use a computer so this map doesn’t capture them. :sarcasm:
 

Borsig

PoKechetkov
Nov 3, 2007
5,469
10,626
Low country coast
I still fail to believe anyone native to SC chooses the rags over the canes.
I go back once a month. People in WV are mostly pens, some caps fans, with a smattering of smashville, who I follow, in the south which is where we are from.

The yankees are a wholly different thing from a generational group of gentleman players like Mantle Gherig, etc. A lot of people with "no team" who like baseball like the yankees. Even my Dad did.

Gen X and under of SW VA / WV pretty much hates anything that comes from NJ, NY, Mass, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
26,006
94,374
I still fail to believe anyone native to SC chooses the rags over the canes.
I go back once a month. People in WV are mostly pens, some caps fans, with a smattering of smashville, who I follow, in the south which is where we are from.

The yankees are a wholly different thing from a generational group of gentleman players like Mantle Gherig, etc. A lot of people with "no team" who like baseball like the yankees. Even my Dad did.

Gen X and under of SW VA / WV pretty much hates anything that comes from NJ, NY, Mass, etc.
I mean isn't it about how many times the team was searched online? Could be as simple as the Rags being a dumpster fire this year and enough people in SC googling to see why to make it swing in that direction
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG and MinJaBen

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
26,006
94,374
I think it's based off last year though
And at that point, they were our top competition for top spot in the division/conference, so again, enough Canes fans could have been googling them (when the Canes was already bookmarked) that it tipped the scales.

These kind of surveys are always crap. The data points are... suspect at best
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw and DaveG

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,511
102,879
Yeah, but I believe his medium and low danger shot SV% is pretty bad, so it doesn't help us much.
Correct.

Of the 37 goalies who played 12 games or more (I used TOI of 650 minutes), Kochetkov ranks 36th out of 37th in Low Danger SV%. Only Georgiev is worse. In MDSV%, he ranks 29th out of 37.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,654
40,384
Correct.

Of the 37 goalies who played 12 games or more (I used TOI of 650 minutes), Kochetkov ranks 36th out of 37th in Low Danger SV%. Only Georgiev is worse. In MDSV%, he ranks 29th out of 37.
The way Tripp was talking about him against SanJose leads me to believe they are actively trying to trade for more than a stop gap back up. Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,838
18,776
Naples, FL
Correct.

Of the 37 goalies who played 12 games or more (I used TOI of 650 minutes), Kochetkov ranks 36th out of 37th in Low Danger SV%. Only Georgiev is worse. In MDSV%, he ranks 29th out of 37.
Damn that’s bad and validates the “eye” test. Goalies are voodoo but Pyotr has disappointed so far this year.

Line changes in practice:
 

Finlandia WOAT

No blocks, No slappers
May 23, 2010
24,484
24,886
Everytime there's a main board thread about 3v3/the shootout, there are posters who cry foul about how it's a gimmick, it's embarrassing. Implying the first 60 minutes are a serious game. It always reminds me of the ending of Slapshot



Anyway the core problem is a vocal chunk of people are dissatisfied with how regulation games end, and whatever you think about 3v3/shootout/ties bringing the latter back doesn't actually solve this issue.
 

bleedgreen

Registered User
Dec 8, 2003
25,296
43,945
colorado
Visit site
It’s fine as is. 3v3 is great. There was an awhile where it got boring but I generally find teams break each other down for great chances no matter what. It’s becoming more rare imo to see a full 3v3 that’s actually boring and nothing happens. Even if they went 3 minutes of possession when it falls apart it’s a skill sprint back and forth that makes up for it. I could see extending this period to avoid the shootout but that’s it. I don’t mind the shootout either.
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
26,006
94,374
It’s fine as is. 3v3 is great. There was an awhile where it got boring but I generally find teams break each other down for great chances no matter what. It’s becoming more rare imo to see a full 3v3 that’s actually boring and nothing happens. Even if they went 3 minutes of possession when it falls apart it’s a skill sprint back and forth that makes up for it. I could see extending this period to avoid the shootout but that’s it. I don’t mind the shootout either.
I think teams are realizing that its much easier to win 3v3 than it is a shootout where one bump on the ice that causes the puck to hop a stick could lose you a game, so everyone goes into the extra session with intent to win.

And anytime I hear anyone call anything a gimmick in the NHL I immediately think of Don Cherry getting redfaced over the Canes clapping at the end of a game and it makes me smile.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad