All these teams are pretty soft...from a statistical standpoint you do get a lot of goals but none of these teams are built to win. Where are the guys who are going to grind it out and the enforcers? No one to protect Gretzky, Et al.
All these teams are pretty soft...from a statistical standpoint you do get a lot of goals but none of these teams are built to win. Where are the guys who are going to grind it out and the enforcers? No one to protect Gretzky, Et al.
Interesting line up.Agree with this to some extent. If you are talking about building a team from the 90's, to play in the 90's, then you would need some physicality. Here's my lineup based on the production from these players when they were Rangers, not after the left or before they got here:
GRAVES, MESS, AK27 (Automatics)
LARMER, TGO, GARTNER (Larms = pro's pro. There's no way I can leave Gretzky off any list. Gartner was one of the best scorers the Rangers ever had).
OGRODNICK, YORK, VERBEEK (Some props for Ogrodnick who scored 43 goals 1 season but was stuck on the transition teams from the 80's to the Mess era. York was a great 2-way player. Verbeek was a ball of hate that could score.)
MATTEAU, MACTAVISH, KOCUR (No better clutch player than Matteau! Matteau! Matteau! On my 4th line, I'll take MacT for his checking ability and winning FO's. Kocur was one of the best heavyweights in NHL history. A necessity in this era of hockey.)
LEETCH, BEUKEBOOM (A great tandem for the era they played in.)
ZUBOV, LOWE (The best offensive Dman the Rangers ever had (?) and one of the best defensive.)
PATRICK, KARPOVTSEV (There really weren't any other 2 Den who deserved much consideration.)
RICHTER, BEEZER (Based on play starting in 90-91, it wouldn't be crazy to put Healy in Beezer's place as a backup.)
Messier, Graves, Beukeboom, Tikkanen?
All tough guys in their own right...but not filling the role I’m thinking of. For several years Gretzky knew if someone hit him the wrong way Marty McSorley was going to pummel the guy who crossed the line. Most successful teams over the long haul need players who are not going to let other teams push around their top guys.
That's how Graves started out....
Yes, let's dig up Marty McSorley to play on these all-star teams.All tough guys in their own right...but not filling the role I’m thinking of. For several years Gretzky knew if someone hit him the wrong way Marty McSorley was going to pummel the guy who crossed the line. Most successful teams over the long haul need players who are not going to let other teams push around their top guys.
Scoring Line - Tikkanen - Gretzky - Gartner - Leetch - Beukeboom
Scoring Line 2 -Graves - Messier - Kovalev - Zubov - Lowe
Checking Line - Nemchinov - MacTavish - Larmer - Samuelsson - Norstrom
Energy/F*them up line - Domi - PJ Stock - Kocur - McSorley - Cairns
Mike Richter
JVB
Stuck Tikki with Gartner & Gretzky to protect them. A natural goal scorer in Gartner with Gretzky/Leetch feeding him would be devastating. Tikkanen/Beuks does the dirty work.
Messier/Graves you can’t break up. Mess doesn’t need anyone protecting him nor does Graves. Kovalev adds skill to the line. I debated removing Kovy but he was always one of my favorites. Zubov/Lowe solid.
Best Checking line in the league. Mac takes all important late game faceoffs. We stick this line on opposing teams top players/lines (Lemieux, Lindros, ect) Ulf gets the stars pissed off by rubbing his glove in faces (-:
4th line is a straight up we’re gonna f* you up and absolutely destroy you. Debated PJ Stock with Ian Lappierre but went with Stock. McSorley can always go ape s*it on anyone if needed. Start this line at the beginning of all Devils, Isles and Philly games. Put shades on for the fire works.
Overall I think it’s well balanced and can match up with any team from the 90’s.
Interesting line up.
One nit: York first season was 99-00 so I think he's more off a 2000s player. And as a replacement I would go with Nemchinov. The guy did it all and was one of the most intelligent players I've seen.
PJ Stock over Darren Langdon? Absolutely not.
Agree with this to some extent. If you are talking about building a team from the 90's, to play in the 90's, then you would need some physicality. Here's my lineup based on the production from these players when they were Rangers, not after the left or before they got here:
GRAVES, MESS, AK27 (Automatics)
LARMER, TGO, GARTNER (Larms = pro's pro. There's no way I can leave Gretzky off any list. Gartner was one of the best scorers the Rangers ever had).
OGRODNICK, YORK, VERBEEK (Some props for Ogrodnick who scored 43 goals 1 season but was stuck on the transition teams from the 80's to the Mess era. York was a great 2-way player. Verbeek was a ball of hate that could score.)
MATTEAU, MACTAVISH, KOCUR (No better clutch player than Matteau! Matteau! Matteau! On my 4th line, I'll take MacT for his checking ability and winning FO's. Kocur was one of the best heavyweights in NHL history. A necessity in this era of hockey.)
LEETCH, BEUKEBOOM (A great tandem for the era they played in.)
ZUBOV, LOWE (The best offensive Dman the Rangers ever had (?) and one of the best defensive.)
PATRICK, KARPOVTSEV (There really weren't any other 2 Den who deserved much consideration.)
RICHTER, BEEZER (Based on play starting in 90-91, it wouldn't be crazy to put Healy in Beezer's place as a backup.)
I'd take any one Turcotte, Nedved or Nemchinov over York. And, Samuelsson/Patrick would be a better 3rd pairing then Karpovtsev. (At least you remembered Jeep.)