Most people hate change.
Everyone hated Facebook's changes when they were first implemented. Now they all think they're great. It takes time.
No, most people just hate ugly and badly executed change
If you want badly executed change, just look at YouTube
So, is the introduction of this nonsense the real reason they wanted to cut down on the number of stickied threads?
It's really poorly styled. And the typography sucks. It's very distracting due to this, in a bad way.
Very poor design. Some designer should be ashamed.
The idea isn't terrible, just the execution.
HF itself already looks somewhat outdated and unprofessional. This new side bar has potential but is complete garbage. HF's is actually a decent looking site, I don't understand why they haven't used its design style of at least some of it on these forums.
With the help of youtube I could code a better side bar than that. Nothing makes me want to click on the links of the articles. It looks like it is from the late 90's.
The twitter feed has potential but again it is only HF's feed. It could be a good idea if they added a couple other people to the feed.
Finally, the thread part is actually a good idea but again looks like **** and it broken. Also it should be featured in the middle instead of the bottom.
I tend to agree. A sidebar isn't a terrible idea in theory, but it absolutely does not gel with the website; it looks like an ad from 2005. If HF wants to run a sidebar, the site probably needs to be overhauled to jive with it.
But then it'd lose some of it's minimalist appeal.
If you're able to edit the CSS, it might work better. Even a little padding within the .rssincl-entry divs and between the rows improves things:
hey mods, is it against the rules to post about a solution which gets rid of the side bar?