If what O'Neill says is true and teams make "very little" off of jersey sales, then I have to think that a group of fans boycotting the new jersey buy not buying it is probably going to go unnoticed by them.
Unfortunately its the only thing we can do.
I'm not a fan of the change, but the uniform looks nice on Hall. The jerseys alone are a definite downgrade though.
I'm not a fan of the change, but the uniform looks nice on Hall. The jerseys alone are a definite downgrade though.
I was wondering if the team would wear a "35 year anniversary" patch, but it's definitely not on that jersey. Didn't they only wear the 30 year patches for one game? It definitely wasn't the whole season like for the 25 year, or like the Rangers love to do for their over-hyped milestones.
He looks like a refugee from a rectangle factory.
I'm not a fan of the change, but the uniform looks nice on Hall. The jerseys alone are a definite downgrade though.
my god those black lines sure do stand out a ton
i wonder what the aways look like
and now I do think they changed the glove design -- no white accents on the red part of the glove in either the warrior glove and not in the bauer glove Hall is wearing
i hall was standing you would notice the lack of waist stripes
pure ****
Yep. Sloppy looking.
And all because they think they'll make money because 'X' number of suckers will go out and "have to" buy a new hockey jersey.
I was wondering if the team would wear a "35 year anniversary" patch, but it's definitely not on that jersey. Didn't they only wear the 30 year patches for one game? It definitely wasn't the whole season like for the 25 year, or like the Rangers love to do for their over-hyped milestones.
and now I do think they changed the glove design -- no white accents on the red part of the glove in either the warrior glove and not in the bauer glove Hall is wearing