Maybe you're right, Lou should have done that. But the loss of not doing that is like a 20% chance of getting an NHL player down the road. It's not a huge deal. So anyone flipping **** over it is really flipping **** over very little.
Exactly. The few examples of deadline trades that are being cited are
1) Teams that were not actually in a playoff position at the deadline, or
2) Traded players that were aging, under-achieving, or role players, and
3) Received little more than mid-round picks in return.
Honestly, Lou could have traded some of our more useless guys, but you have no idea what the returns were looking like. At the end of the day, if all we were getting back was mid round or lower picks, then maybe Lou felt the team had a better chance of getting back on track as is over the likelihood that any of those crappy picks would ever pan out in the NHL. It could go either way, but it certainly isn't anything that makes him a bad GM.
I brought up the Parise topic because that's one that gets cited a lot, and there is literally no GM in NHL history that has ever traded a great player in those circumstances barring a locker-room or off-ice issue.
The biggest criticism you can give Lou is the contracts he gives out. But let's face it...almost every GM in the league now gives out stupid contracts to players that don't deserve them.