GDT: New Jersey Devils @ New York Islanders - 7:30pm

Bleedred

#FIREDAVEROGALSKI
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
133,128
62,414
They’re no Flyers, now that’s a team with a future you can get excited about.



On the Flyers board.
Good call my friend. Very gutsy team coached by Torts, who we never beat no matter where he coaches because he just absolutely refuses to lose to us. That Flyers team is off to a white hot 3-1-0 start and has a better record more wins than the NJD!
:sarcasm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
It's never been less of a power play league.

In 2003 (just picked a random year), 29% of goals were scored on the power play. In 2023, ~21% of goals were. In 1983, ~23% were.

The recent bump in goal scoring is related to effectiveness of PP units. The 2022-23 PP% of 21.31% was 9th highest.

It’s been over 20% for 3 seasons now after not getting that high since 1989-90 (20.77%). It hadn’t gotten over 21% since 1985-86 (22.10%).

That’s why there were more PP goals per game in 2022-23 then in the 12 previous seasons.

There’s also been a new bump in PP opportunities, after about a decade of that being at all time low.

Elite teams have elite power plays. You can’t only rely on that, and occasionally top teams make do with out it, but even if you don’t think we needed an improved PP then you have to admit it’s immensely helpful. (I think we needed it and should have one considering the players we have.)


Edit: Saw this after I wrote this all out lol. I’ve been fixated on Power Plays being about efficiency for a while.

The PP specialist is gone. There’s still way fewer PP opportunities now than in 1990s and way fewer defensemen get some that time.


This is from last year...


"For the last two seasons, each team was getting 2.89 power plays per game. This year, the number has risen to 3.26, the highest rate since 2013-14.

Power-play efficiency also continues to trend upward. But that has been happening pretty steadily for 25 years, from a low of 15.08 percent in 1997-98.

Still, after hovering around the 20 percent mark for the last five seasons, this year's power-play success rate has jumped to 22.42 percent. It's the fifth-highest conversion rate since this data was first recorded in 1963-64. The other four years were all between 1978 and 1983 — think stand-up goalies and Gretzky setting up teammates from his office behind the net. And they're not much higher: the all-time record is 22.94 percent in 1982-83.
 
Last edited:

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,360
Happy with the win, worried about Schmid's very bad performance. But I'll just assume it's part of the up and down of the season and hope to see him but a good performance out next time. Sorokin was very good and very lucky on a few of those saves. Definitely feel this one should have had a lot more breathing room but i'll take the two points and move on. Jack Hughes is unreal. He's everything we could have hoped for when we won that lotto pick.
im still skeptical of Schmid!

i think his reaction-time is kinda stinky
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hisch13r

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,665
38,155
Schmid will have bad games. He’s a young goalie still learning. It happens.

How quickly people forget he’s most likely the reason why we won the Rangers series. The kid has skill and potential, goalies take more time to develop.
 

Bleedred

#FIREDAVEROGALSKI
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
133,128
62,414
im still skeptical of Schmid!

i think his reaction-time is kinda stinky
It’s fair to be skeptical because he may have overachieved last season. His reaction time hasn’t been good in his two games in the regular season so far, but I don’t remember it being a problem last year.

Still, I’d rather have him sucking at under a million a year than the former #29 at almost $2.5 million and providing his usual .89x goaltending over his last 80 games played.
 

Hischier and Hughes

“I love to hockey”
Jan 28, 2018
9,408
4,360
It’s fair to be skeptical because he may have overachieved last season. His reaction time hasn’t been good in his two games in the regular season so far, but I don’t remember it being a problem last year.

Still, I’d rather have him sucking at under a million a year than the former #29 at almost $2.5 million and providing his usual .89x goaltending over his last 80 games played.
it might just be me or maybe im poor at judging goalies!!

every game of his - i feel hes the opposite of Vanecek in that hes very stoic, always in position and a big body

whereas Vanecek is better at making those scrambling saves and has more pure athleticism i think and quicker reactions, but gets beat cleanly more!
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,665
38,155
With advanced stats, it feels people over analyze the game.

Schmid played like a turd, they went down a player and the Devils defense was “meh” at best. You take that win to the bank.

We know they can play better and they still won…

View attachment 755937
They played awesome in the 1st and 2nd. Got a little meh after, but overall that was a very good game for the team. Schmid had a rough one, it happens.
 

Camille the Eel

Registered User
Could be that Schmid just hasn’t played enough steadily as this season starts to get himself sharp. He looked great in camp but the schedule has been so weird starting out and he could be iced with not having seen much game action. He certainly did look really off last night. On that first Nelson shot, it wasn’t so much that he reacted late - rather it looked like he never reacted at all. He had this deer in the headlights look last night that I’ve never seen from him before.
 

Hisch13r

Registered User
May 16, 2012
34,902
35,426
NJ
Could be that Schmid just hasn’t played enough steadily as this season starts to get himself sharp. He looked great in camp but the schedule has been so weird starting out and he could be iced with not having seen much game action. He certainly did look really off last night. On that first Nelson shot, it wasn’t so much that he reacted late - rather it looked like he never reacted at all. He had this deer in the headlights look last night that I’ve never seen from him before.

I mean it’s not like he got to play steadily last year
 

Camille the Eel

Registered User
I mean it’s not like he got to play steadily last year
He had a ton of action in Utica before and after every stretch here. In effect he was in well tuned game form before we called him up against Ottawa last year and pretty much any time Blackwood was supposed to be healthy we’d send him down and he’d get a ton of steady play there again.

To be sure, we don’t know what’s the difference in him these last 2 games. Could certainly be just an off night or 2.
 

Devs3cups

Wind of Change
Sponsor
May 8, 2010
21,665
38,155
He had a ton of action in Utica before and after every stretch here. In effect he was in well tuned game form before we called him up against Ottawa last year and pretty much any time Blackwood was supposed to be healthy we’d send him down and he’d get a ton of steady play there again.

To be sure, we don’t know what’s the difference in him these last 2 games. Could certainly be just an off night or 2.
Last night was rough, but he was fine in his start against the Coyotes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Camille the Eel

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,936
18,370

Watching Luke’s goal, I think you can see that the Isles decided Jack has to be cut off whenever possible at any point of the ice.

Jack’s early career, teams would let him play around from the outside and up high because he wasn’t dangerous until he got inside. Now, Jack is dangerous everywhere, below the goal line, on the half boards, up high, or in the slot; he can create or score a goal from all those spots.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad