'Potentially available' is a loaded comment lol...I'd put him behind Sullivan and maybe Brindy but I doubt either is actually available.where would brunette rank among the list of potentially available coaches right now?
Every coach has their weaknessess. Woodcroft lost the dressing room pretty quickly so I wonder how he handles with star players / big egos. And I'm not sure how good of a systems coach Berube is.I'm not really as interested in Keefe as most of you.
I don't think he's bad a coach. But ultimately, the coach has to figure out a way to solve the team's problems. He correctly identified them in Toronto, but never solved them. Part of that is personnel, but that's the job.
Berube and Woodcroft are my top two choices by a very large margin.
We saw him put in Samsonov for the first 4 games. You'll get outcoached by Travis Green doing that stuff.
To me, Berube is best systems coach out of all the options. He's shown a lot of versatility. The Cup-winning Blues played a hardnosed, stifling defensive game, and offensively created on the forecheck and with heavy OZPs. Since his roster turned over considerably, he's leaned into a much more transition-based, east-west "quality" chance generating system to leverage what he has in guys like Thomas, Kyrou and Buchnevich.Every coach has their weaknessess. Woodcroft lost the dressing room pretty quickly so I wonder how he deal with star players / big egos. And I'm not sure how good of a systems coach Berube is.
Every coach has their weaknessess. Woodcroft lost the dressing room pretty quickly so I wonder how he handles with star players / big egos. And I'm not sure how good of a systems coach Berube is.
Hey guys Leafs fans here. Here is some intel on Keefe if you guys hire him.
First of all he's a good coach. He's failed in the playoffs no doubt and outcoached in most series.
-excellent systems coach. He's always had a good system in place no matter what roster he had.
-Best attribute is his defensive structure. Even with lackluster D cores, he made them work. They were always an above average or better defensive team sometimes great.
- first time this year the PK was bad. Other years it's been good
- when he didn't have to cater to stars egos, he was excellent. Look at the record when a star wasn't in the lineup.
-changed lines a lot in games. Some coaches just stick with it no matter what but Keefe constsntly shuffled lines looking for answers.
Weaknesses
-playoffs is the main thing. Outcoached simple as that.
-experimented in season with different combos, but maybe not enough.
-few times in big games, did things hoping they would stick
-youngters tolerance for mistakes were a bit lower compared to others.
Maybe I overinterpred and/or misremembered the situation.I haven't heard this? Did Oilers fan say this or something by their media?
same as his Jack Adams rankings - 3rdwhere would brunette rank among the list of potentially available coaches right now?
Good defensive structure without sacrificing offense and making counter-adjustments to win in different ways are two things the Devils desperately need from a coach. The former seems to be a big strength of Keefe's, but the latter seems to be a big weakness.
None of these coaches are gonna check all the boxes. Fitz has his work cut out for him.
You never know what is going on behind the scenes. From that short clip posted in the video where Keefe is identifying that the team isn't going to the net to score, I'm skeptical he didn't then tell them to go to the net to score. But how coachable are guys like Matthews, Marner, etc? I think Bratt, Hischier, Meier, and even Jack and Luke will do what is asked but they may bristle if the plan isn't good.Listening to Pucksoup podcast and DGB. These are the main problems I hear about Keefe:
Had the issue with his teams that they seem to have some very slow starts to games/series. So que the Lindy "unprepared" comparisons.
They'd always play down to their competition.
Always performed best when the expectations were low. Ie, down 3-1 in a series. Struggled when in command like 3-1 up in a series.
I know some will point to the core 4 of TML as the problem here, but just providing what I've heard. Also concerns me how little regulation wins they had this year. Really seems like the team went backwards.
This is interesting at least. Of course, it still falls on him as a coach that he couldn't get the stars to understand after all this time that you have to commit to playing a certain way in the playoffs, but he certainly identified the issues they had some time ago.
Makes it at least pretty clear that the players there couldn't get the message.
The thing about the Leafs and translating Keefe to the Devils; I think when healthy our roster was better than theirs on paper. Hughes isn't quite the same talent as Matthews but Hischier, Bratt, Meier is as good of a supporting cast as Marner, Nylander, Tavares and the rest of our roster 1-6 on D and 5-12 Forwards was equal or better than theirs at the start of the year. Both goalie situations were a crapshoot as it turned out.Listening to Pucksoup podcast and DGB. These are the main problems I hear about Keefe:
Had the issue with his teams that they seem to have some very slow starts to games/series. So que the Lindy "unprepared" comparisons.
They'd always play down to their competition.
Always performed best when the expectations were low. Ie, down 3-1 in a series. Struggled when in command like 3-1 up in a series.
I know some will point to the core 4 of TML as the problem here, but just providing what I've heard. Also concerns me how little regulation wins they had this year. Really seems like the team went backwards.
who has been rumored to have interviewed for the job so far?
To me, Berube is best systems coach out of all the options. He's shown a lot of versatility. The Cup-winning Blues played a hardnosed, stifling defensive game, and offensively created on the forecheck and with heavy OZPs. Since his roster turned over considerably, he's leaned into a much more transition-based, east-west "quality" chance generating system to leverage what he has in guys like Thomas, Kyrou and Buchnevich.
I don't know how anyone can make a determination of Woodcroft "in the room" or whatever. His goalies were letting in like 3 out of every 7 shots for the first 20 games and that ultimately is what got him fired.
was there anyone that doesn’t have any nhl experience ?I’ve heard McClellan, Woodcroft, Berube and not much else.
was there anyone that doesn’t have any nhl experience ?
His rosters also deteriorated significantly. A decline in team performance was expected.Berube was good when he had Savard and then Montgomery as assistants, then he wasn’t so good.