ult
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2009
- 2,069
- 243
Novosibirsk Arena has a webcam now. Follow the link - Электронный город. Облачное видеонаблюдение , click "ДЕМО", change the page by clicking a small circle and look for "Строительство нового ЛДС".
Thanks for that, I as the creepy dude who watches webcams from Novisibirsk now have a much better alternative to avtoline-nsk.ru
Krylov said the same about Arena Omsk. He said they'd share a link to follow the progress via webcam. Looking forward to it. I will never understand how such a young arena is built so badly that it requires demolition in less than 10 years but anyways, at this point, I'm glad they are actually working on a solution. I still have this "What if they stop funding the project and Avangard goes back to Omsk?" question in the back of my head but I guess Gazprom has enough monies to deal with it regardless of what happens in the country or the company.
Indoor ice rinks in Tatarstan (Kazan) vs Bashkortostan (Ufa).
Зелёное дерби. 46:15 в пользу Татарстана
Volga Regions. From 22 to 186 in the last 20 years. NN is very close to Kazan.
22/186 Как вам такое Артемий Панарин и Борис Михайлов?
Novosibirsk Region - 16 vs Omsk Region - 9.
Сибирское дерби. 16:9 в пользу Новосибирска
IMO your second paragraph contradicts your first one. Quantity will lead to quality eventually. NA is no bottomless pit which will simply absorb more and more Russian kids down the line, thus if Russian hockey gets even close to Canadian in sheer numbers, the all around quality will improve by leaps and bounds.I'm afraid the increase of number of rinks is not going to help Russian hockey too much unless they can stop the flow of 15-18 year old leaving the country. The ones leaving are always the best ones in their age groups. The ones that leave generally regress and won't reach their potential.
But more rinks is always good though, at least for quantity if not for quality. Quality is the one that suffers because those players who had the potential to become world-class players leave and regress, and those that stay never had that potential to begin with.
IMO your second paragraph contradicts your first one. Quantity will lead to quality eventually. NA is no bottomless pit which will simply absorb more and more Russian kids down the line, thus if Russian hockey gets even close to Canadian in sheer numbers, the all around quality will improve by leaps and bounds.
I assume the post where you said Kakko will turn into a superstar and Svechnikov will be a 2nd line forward was deleted but 5 games in, Kakko hasn't shown anything that would prove he is better than Svech was a year ago and Svechnikov himself has 7 points.Pretty good progress from 8 rinks in 2002 to around 60 rinks in 2019. Hopefully it will bring some results too. Too bad the best ones will leave for North America before they even turn 17. Kazan has been losing many talented kids in recent years in that age, and they have not amounted into anything meaningful. A kid like Svechnikov would have developed better in the KHL than he did in USA juniors.
Samara