All valid reasons, but you're taking this stuff way too seriously mate. Of course, any expansion stuff will be cloud IX orgasm. And again, any SE expansion would be like 20 to 40 years in the making and even those numbers might be too early. Don't think I am proposing it because I ain't, all I am looking at is if expansion did happen, it would be for the reasons I mentioned above (i.e. 4-5 teams all starting it at the same time). I can't see Auburn, Bama, UF, FSU, Clemson, and others just starting one DI out of nowhere. I think Georgia Tech probably has the best bet, but I don't see how their AD would see them on an island and approve such a programme. The only exception is if ACC decides to start one, but they have big problems of their own, they're looking to do their best to retain teams and are not close to thinking of expansion of any sport any time soon. We all know that the best bet for these Power 5 schools to get a programme is to get a sugar daddy like Pegula. Few will ever do it properly compared to the likes of how Lindenwood and LIU did it.Sorry your husband was a losing coach, Mrs. Zombo.
Look! Pie! Up there in the sky!
All this talk of hypotheticals and what it would take is ridiculous. It's literally wishcasting crossed with fever dreams and masturbation.
Arizona has had access to a rink for decades but never started a real college hockey program. Why?
UNLV has had access to a building with an ice plant for 41 years but never started a real college hockey program. Why?
Southern California literally had a rink that hosted NHL games across the street from the campus from 1959 until 2016 but never started a real college hockey program. Why?
It's a three-fold answer: 1) There's no money because the athletic budget is devoted to football, basketball, and not getting sued under Title IX. 2) There's not significant enough interest among fans, donors, or alumni. 3) Without the draw of the school's traditional opponents, the sport is going to have a lot of trouble drawing fans, and a program that costs $1+ million a year to operate is going to immediately be in the hole if they can't draw fans. A program that's losing six figures a year at a power conference school is a program that is going to be cut.
The only reason ASU has a team is that Don Lewin's kid wanted to play real college hockey, so he wrote an enormous check.
Even if North Carolina's hockey boosters build a rink, I don't see real college hockey happening in Chapel Hill. It's not just the rink that needs funding, it's the operating budget. And UNC won't draw flies unless they're playing ACC or otherwise big name southern opponents.
And no school in Florida has expressed any interest in starting a real college hockey program. The most likely candidate would be FGCU, which could share Hertz Arena with the Everblades, but again: Where's the money going to come from?
No big name school like Florida, Florida State, UCF, or Miami (Fla.) is just going to throw a program together a la Stonehill, Lindenwood, or LIU. Why? It hurts their athletic brand to have a thrown-together program that stumbles for several years out of the gate. Alumni and donors would be PISSED if they gave the school a six- or seven-figure check only for the school to win 13 games (five wins against Stonehill!) in the first two seasons like Lindenwood did.
When your brand has significant value, as any power conference school's athletic teams do, you don't do things by half measures. If it's worth doing, you do it right or you don't do it so you don't alienate alumni and donors. That's just a big a barrier to fanboi expansionist fever dreams as money.
Last edited: