I agree but statistically he’s by far the worst defensively and the Carrier pairing with him has giving up the most goalsThe org seems to have a big league hards on for Lauzon so i doubt he gets moved
I agree but statistically he’s by far the worst defensively and the Carrier pairing with him has giving up the most goalsThe org seems to have a big league hards on for Lauzon so i doubt he gets moved
Definitely dont disagree and overall i havent hated his game this season. When he keeps his game simple, he has pretty good momentsThe org seems to have a big league hards on for Lauzon so i doubt he gets moved
If you think Josi is a major problem with this team and Lauzon is a positive, you've lost the plot.you are still left with Josi doing some increasingly slow crazy move at, and turning the puck over at the blue line time after time that always results in a goal at least 2 times a game that no one ever talks about ! i swear whenever the other team scores I see 59 out there , he always gets a pass . I mean would it hurt this guy to lift every now and then this guy is skin and bones. getin slower I might add. Lauzon is startin to look like a French Scott Stevens some nights ! While the other guys are tip toen through the tulips. So while were throwing out the Flowers , lets keep our guns.
NoIf you think Josi is a major problem with this team and Lauzon is a positive, you've lost the plot.
Yeah don't know what the solution is but letting him play through it doesn't seem to be working.Well, it's happening. Our nightmare scenario(unless you want to tank). Over the 25 years I've been watching hockey I've seen it happen to many other goalies but never one of ours. This is the Good Goalie Suddenly Sucks Syndrome.
Time to give Lanky the net for a bit and see what happens. Maybe Saros gets it back, I dunno, but it sure is brutal to watch
I don't think anyone is gonna argue that Lankinen is a big upgrade over Saros, just that it's time to give Lankinen a chance to see how he performs when he's getting 4 out of every 5 starts. Who knows maybe he will find a groove that he can't find playing once every two weeks.Four or more allowed in ---
11 of 32 for Saros
3 of 8 for Lankinen
0 of 1 for Askarov.
Tonight is 18 of 32 starts by Saros allowing 3+ .... Lanks has 6 of 8 ... our goaltending tandem giving up 3+ in 60% of their starts.
Trading him at his absolute lowest value is brilliant strategyTrade Saros and Platoon Askarov and Lankinen
I think the bigger issue is 4 of the last 5 for saros. It had been a VERY rough patch. This is why many people are struggling to stand by him at the moment. Every goalie will have bad stretches. A couple throw away games. 4 games out of 5 with 5 goals against though?Four or more allowed in ---
11 of 32 for Saros
3 of 8 for Lankinen
0 of 1 for Askarov.
Tonight is 18 of 32 starts by Saros allowing 3+ .... Lanks has 6 of 8 ... our goaltending tandem giving up 3+ in 60% of their starts.
I think the bigger issue is 4 of the last 5 for saros. It had been a VERY rough patch. This is why many people are struggling to stand by him at the moment. Every goalie will have bad stretches. A couple throw away games. 4 games out of 5 with 5 goals against though?
There has been some flukey goals off of defenders, lazy defense, etc in here without a doubt. It isnt 100% Saros. There has also been some bad goaltending
His value may not be higher than it is now- he looks cookedTrading him at his absolute lowest value is brilliant strategy![]()
Cant disagree that neither goalie is doing stellar but in a bubble i take 3,4,3,5,3 over 5,5,0,5,5 any day. The team for sure isnt helping either. The team is averaging 3.10 goals per game so it is a bit more of a horse race but better chance of getting more wins out of those couple games or atleast some OT losses. Either way this isnt sustainable and maintaining a spot in the wildcard. Somethings gonna have to giveNeither goaltender is doing well over their last five or so starts. Lanks last five starts are 3,4,3,5,3 goals allowed. Saros last five 5,5,0,5,5. For the season they are each allowing 4+ in over 30% of their starts .... they are each allowing 3+ in 60%. Our starting goalie has allowed under three goals in just 2 of the last 11 games ... the Saros shutout against the Hawks and Askarov's lone NHL start.
Last night we saw a Ducks player emerge from the box and get a clean one on one against Saros ... total failure by all six players on the ice. Saros on breakaways has never been his strong suit during regulation while somehow he does fairly well in shootouts. The first goal allowed was simply getting Saros moving laterally and he opened the five hole wide. Step one in that chain was a horrible powerplay ... step two was not accounting for the player coming from the box and letting him run amok behind all five skaters ... step three was Saros getting beaten badly.
Thanks for the advice, Ellis. Let me know what kind of deal you get from Hans.His value may not be higher than it is now- he looks cooked
I broker multi million dollar assets as part of my day job where I discern dynamic market environments and advise clients with actionable decisions to maximize asset value.
The old paradigm normally rings true “ if you sit on the fence for too long all youre going to get is a sore ass”
This last game had some real flukey stuff (McD and Fabbro redirects), defense lapses (free player behind the defense on our expiring powerplay), and a snipe - granted i think saros is playing pretty low/deep into the goal but that may just be due to his lack of size. He started the game absorbing some shots and i thought yeh good start. Not giving off rebounds and he doesmt look to be fighting it. Then the defense killed him. Not saying he couldnt of stopped 'em. Just the defense put him in a less than desirable position.You all are so much brighter than me stats wise, but every goalie has to overcome flukey goals by stopping what he should stop, when he should stop them. Sometimes, even the flukey ones. Sometimes even ones he shouldn’t be able to stop. Saros is starting to remind me of Ellis. His size was only a concern when his speed and reflexes slowed