Megustaelhockey
"I like hockey" in Spanish
- Apr 29, 2011
- 23,461
- 17,606
Are we saying that ^^ this kind of raw emotion makes for the best type of captain, though? Why can't a team be successful with a quieter, admittedly less rah-rah kind of guy?
CBJ currently have no C. Dubinsky was discussed by fans. My personal conclusion - he's too much of a hot head to wear the C.
Are we saying that ^^ this kind of raw emotion makes for the best type of captain, though? Why can't a team be successful with a quieter, admittedly less rah-rah kind of guy?
Am I the only one who thinks the captaincy is little more than some extra stitching on your jersey and the ability to talk to the referee?
Am I the only one who thinks the captaincy is little more than some extra stitching on your jersey and the ability to talk to the referee?
This is one of those topics where everyone has a different opinion, and all of those opinions are correct depending on the situation. In some team dynamics, the captaincy is exactly what you say here. You might have a whole team of guys moving in the same direction, with several guys taking the lead and the letters meaning little or nothing (I honestly think this was the case in 2011). Have a young team? Maybe a steady vet is the best option for a captain. A vet team? You might need a fiery guy to keep those vets from acting too complacent (paging Mr.'s Nash and Richards...).
Would Dubinsky make a good captain? Yes, he would on a team that needs a passionate guy to lead the way. Some rosters, he would be a detriment as a captain.
The C can mean a lot of things (or absolutely nothing). It's all situational.
Am I the only one who thinks the captaincy is little more than some extra stitching on your jersey and the ability to talk to the referee?
Am I the only one who thinks the captaincy is little more than some extra stitching on your jersey and the ability to talk to the referee?
Young captains get chosen around the league and do well enough. It's about the person not their age. Some people mature quickly. I personally don't care who they give it to, but if they think a young guy is ready to take it, I trust that.
Despite recent struggles, Nash is still leading the team in goals.
I think his comments here are just a testament to how much he respects McDonagh and the two veterans (Richards and St. Louis) too.
Are we saying that ^^ this kind of raw emotion makes for the best type of captain, though? Why can't a team be successful with a quieter, admittedly less rah-rah kind of guy?
Lidstrom captained the Red Wings...he never struck me as a guy who was rah rah.
one of the greatest players to play the game, and captained his team to a championship.
Nash isnt Messier. He's Mike Gartner.
Quiet, consistent every year, happy to show up to work but not a rah-rah get-on-my-back kind of player.
Mike Gartner had a reputation of a floater and a softy, and a guy who pulled a vanishing act every postseason. Great teammate, nice guy. Not a leader.
Nash is not a leader. Nothing wrong with that. He understands his role and he sticks to it.
Wait... people are really talking about Nash as captain?
I would make Boyle the captain before Nash.