Comparing Neely to Clark is insulting. Neely was a four-time post-season all-star who finished in the top 12 for career goals per game and 4th in playoff goals per game. He finished on top of his game. Clark was injury prone, but had only a couple really strong seasons, was never a post-season all-star, and bounced around his final years.
Comparing Neely to Kerr is even worse. They were completely different players. Kerr was an average player at five-on-five who earned his place in the game because he was virtually unstoppable on the power play. Neely was a dominant force offensively at his peak who could control the game physically and was one of the best in the world at his peak.
People who say "Neely was never the best player on his team" against him are myopic. He played with one of the 10-15 best players in NHL history. That's like saying Jari Kurri was never the best player on his team. So Cliff Ronning is more deserving of enshrinement because he was the best player on his team.
Never said Lindros was the best player in the world. I didn't dispute his Hart season in a lockout-shortened 1995, but awards for that year should be asterisked. I've said repeatedly that if he would have retired after the 1998-99 season, he'd have been a cinch for the Hall. But he hasn't done a damn thing since, has not been intimidating since then, and may have cost him his spot in the Hall with his mediocre play.