Foppberg
Registered User
Yup... Shocking.His imagination running wild with typical local media rumor-mongering catering to a local Vancouver fanbase.
Rumor: - 2021-2022 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Part VIII: All Rumors No Trades
Yup... Shocking.His imagination running wild with typical local media rumor-mongering catering to a local Vancouver fanbase.
Which is why I would never call him a recent first round pick lmao!!!just as a reminder for future discussions.
boeser was picked in the same draft.
Career body of work clearly shows Garland is the superior player and it’s not even close. It’s not all about cost per point from half a season. Garland also gets zero PP1 time. Garland is 1st on the Canucks in even strength points.
Thank you.This is false and Drance, who was one of the one's that initially reported this, had to clear up in his Athletic article that Byram was never offered.
I'm not here to disparage DeBrusk as i like him and wouldn't mind the Canucks making a play for him.Explain how Garlands career body of work is significantly better? Back it up.
Debrusk also doesn’t get any PP1 time.
Explain how Garlands career body of work is significantly better? Back it up.
Debrusk also doesn’t get any PP1 time.
This is just one of the many ways Garland is better. There you go.I'm not here to disparage DeBrusk as i like him and wouldn't mind the Canucks making a play for him.
In the last 2 yrs
Garland has 47 primary pts 5v5 and 55 total
DeBrusk has 21 primary pts 5v5 and 30 total.
That's a significant gap
I'm not here to disparage DeBrusk as i like him and wouldn't mind the Canucks making a play for him.
In the last 2 yrs
Garland has 47 primary pts 5v5 and 55 total
DeBrusk has 21 primary pts 5v5 and 30 total.
That's a significant gap
"Big off years" are when players don't play well, right? Okay, I can see your point, a player's performance isn't really relevant when you're talking about their performance.Covid year was a big off year for Jake so it’s misleading.
"Big off years" are when players don't play well, right? Okay, I can see your point, a player's performance isn't really relevant when you're talking about their performance.
Garland massively outperformed Debrusk at ES the year before as well, despite getting significantly less ice time. So that's three straight seasons in which he's been a demonstrably far more productive player.
all even strength production numbers29 ES points for Garland the year before to Debrusks 25 is a massive outperformance?
Y’all have outdone yourself here lol