Schennanigans
Registered User
Good move by the habs. Can’t lose here.
It's easy to dismiss a guy when he's the Designated Expendable in eleventy billion different variants of the same rejected proposals.Yeah... Key word "every". The vitriol and obnoxiousness meeting most proposals and opinions offered by Habs fans around here has gotten to ridiculous proportions.
As it turns out, Harris does have value :
Because plenty were likely wrong based on that information. Assumptions were being made that were not in evidence. And we didn't get the evidence that Waddell's perspective was different until yesterday.Operating with the same available information, assessments were offered that you, among others, discounted entirely.
No, but folks seem to assume we are - special w/r/t getting badly ripped off in every trade, anyways. The track record is still overwhelmingly in our favor.Blue Jackets aren't "special".
Not accounting sufficiently for the fact that there's a different guy at the helm was undoubtedly the biggest assessment error here. That said, it's become so commonplace for folks to dismiss every Jackets asset as borderline valueless because "lol Columbus" that separating the signal from the noise when a new guy comes in is damnably difficult.Waddell is a long time GM. There was a visible precedent at play that was likely to (& clearly did) factor into any trade made.
NopeHighest paid player on the team 5 games without a goal and the press and fans will be all over him
It's easy but it's also foolish to rate a player based on how often he's in trade proposals from one of the biggest fanbases.It's easy to dismiss a guy when he's the Designated Expendable in eleventy billion different variants of the same rejected proposals.
It's easy to dismiss a guy when he's the Designated Expendable in eleventy billion different variants of the same rejected proposals.
For my part I didn't think he'd fit here because we had a similar blueline logjam. Then Waddell came in and dumped half of our blueline depth and replaced it by contracting out with a necromancer to bring back JMFJ. Against that, Harris suddenly starts to look pretty damn good.
True. From the Jackets perspective, again, he didn't have much value to us until about a month ago, after Waddell got finished giving away all the depth guys that were otherwise in the way.It's easy but it's also foolish to rate a player based on how often he's in trade proposals from one of the biggest fanbases.
Lots of wishful thinking in 2 paragraphs. I can't imagine you truly believe the first one. Montreal media is wild and the fanbase has very little self control. They believe just about anything, look no further than recently going after Chabots wife online because Shawn Simpson made a sarcastic joke about Montreal being on his 10 team no trade list.There's zero pressure in Montreal at least for another 2 years. Fans understand they are in the rebuild and just enjoying watching the player development. This is a perfect environment for Laine. He doesn't have to do anything. Like Gallagher and Josh Anderson, he can massively under-perform and it doesn't matter.
Habs will likely rehabilitate Laine then trade him at a TDL at 50% cap for a massive return.
Yup, Leafs should have chosen Laine first over all over Matthews, Habs are all set now.Montreal going to win the cup before Toronto does?
I'm legit beginning to wonder to what degree that's exceptional as compared to any other fanbase when scaled up to that size. At the very least I can't remember the last time someone was exorcated there for not speaking French outside of shitposting speculation here.Lots of wishful thinking in 2 paragraphs. I can't imagine you truly believe the first one. Montreal media is wild and the fanbase has very little self control. They believe just about anything, look no further than recently going after Chabots wife online because Shawn Simpson made a sarcastic joke about Montreal being on his 10 team no trade list.
There's gonna be pressure. Even if there shouldn't be. I agree with you they're 2 years away but it's naive to think there won't be any.
No one could fit Laine into their plans. The habs had the space to take on the risk. To say he stinks simply isn't true.What are you trying to say here? The Habs were the only team to call and got this awesome steal?
No one wanted Laine for a reason
You make it sound like the Habs flat out added 17.5M of dead cap. But Laine's value is not zero dollars. Not even close.What would you call giving away 17.5M in cap space and getting basically a 3rd round pick in value back? I'd want a 1st for that kind of cap space. Heck, you got a 1st for taking 6.3M back. This is 3 times that.
5 games... Its Montréal... if he don't get hot in pre-season, its overHighest paid player on the team 5 games without a goal and the press and fans will be all over him
Because plenty were likely wrong based on that information. Assumptions were being made that were not in evidence. And we didn't get the evidence that Waddell's perspective was different until yesterday.
You keep posting that in various threads... Very odd victim narrative that seems to cloud your reading of what's being said.No, but folks seem to assume we are - special w/r/t getting badly ripped off in every trade, anyways. The track record is still overwhelmingly in our favor.
Not accounting sufficiently for the fact that there's a different guy at the helm was undoubtedly the biggest assessment error here. That said, it's become so commonplace for folks to dismiss every Jackets asset as borderline valueless because "lol Columbus" that separating the signal from the noise when a new guy comes in is damnably difficult.
Yup. This could be a huge win for the habs or not. IMHO, they didn't give up much outside of taking on his salary.Yes. Laine is an $8.7M one dimensional player who has personal issues and has forced his way out of 2 organizations.
Normally, but when the record is literally 9-0 in favor of "non-Jackets fans consistently underestimate Jackets trade results" going back well over a decade and across multiple GMs, it's difficult to exaggerate much. Seriously, the track record dates all the way back to the Rick Nash and Jeff Carter trades.Being right or wrong is a different thing than making good or bad assessments.
Awareness of available precedents, and considering the broad & precise context make for better assessments.... Discounting precedent and exagerating ones uniqueness, make for limited/worse assessments.
Probably because it's been consistently true.You keep posting that in various threads... Very odd victim narrative that seems to cloud your reading of what's being said.
Much of which was here, while those many trades that were wrongly predicted to all end exceptionally badly for the Blue Jackets were taking place.Davidson has a long track record.
Man you need the guy to play with McDavid to get good or what like at least give us a chance with him MulletmanAnybody told Montreal that just because Patrick Laine has a name that sounds like he's French Canadian, he's not actually French Canadian...
This is just terrible... Another 50 point season with huge dissapointment incomming for Laine. Hopefully he can get traded at the deadline for some picks and prospects...
I'll take that bet all day long. I get the under. I'll give you 5-1 odds too.Going to be lovely when Laine pots 100 points playing with Caufield and Slafkovsky next season.
this is what I mean by "narrow".Normally, but when the record is literally 7-0 in favor of "non-Jackets fans consistently underestimate Jackets trade results" going back well over a decade and across multiple GMs, it's difficult to exaggerate much. Seriously, the track record dates all the way back to the Rick Nash and Jeff Carter trades.
I can see that you believe this to be true...Probably because it's been consistently true.
Much of which was here, while those many trades that were wrongly predicted to all end exceptionally badly for the Blue Jackets were taking place.
Was he not president who hired Waddell before moving on to special advisor/governor role?Davidson is also minimally involved nowadays.
My question is why is CBJ treating this like a cap dump, when they had cap space and aren't competing immediately. Probably would not have to haven given up a 2nd if trading at the deadline.
Went through that with PLD. Just can't have it again, especially with so many young players. Just gotta cut the cancer and move on.My question is why is CBJ treating this like a cap dump, when they had cap space and aren't competing immediately. Probably would not have to haven given up a 2nd if trading at the deadline.