- Jun 24, 2012
- 85,405
- 156,664
who goes "all in" on yak....... rofl, at this point you could prob get him for a prospect.
You go "all in" if you can get the Oilers to include the swarm of bees that usually chase Yakupov.
who goes "all in" on yak....... rofl, at this point you could prob get him for a prospect.
I would think they try him on a line with Galchenyuk given their past history and chemistry together. If they acquired him.
Fair enough, just something I thought they might try if they got him. Anyway it's Eklund.for me the fact that they played junior hockey together is irrelevant, they also played without each other and put up the same numbers, its junior they were both above that league, ripping it doesnt mean they had chemistry. i'd acquire yak because i've always like the prospect and he could bounce with a change of scenery but could also bust!
This must be a hot topic on his site or it's a personal favourite of his, but he's hot on this like no other issue.
Not saying he's in the know, but if the Habs shift Shaw to the 2LW position, they are once again short an RW.
What's the consensus on the possibility of this and the possible cost?
This thread is for the trade Rumor, not Eklunds credibility.
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/Montreal-All-in-on-Yakupov-What-Should-the-Price-Be/1/78841
and
http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklu...ostonCaps-also-interested-IslesEberle/1/78853
"Where he is" is a guy who scores ~12 goals a year and is one of the worst defensive players in the NHL. Possibly the very worst. And he costs $2.5 million to get that.
If Yakupov "tops out where he is," he's a waiver clear, not a guy who gets traded for a second rounder.
To put this in perspective, Sam Gagner has outproduced Yakupov every season of their shared career, plays a more important position than Yakupov and is stuck signing 1 year deals for close to league minimum. Nobody would consider trading a 2nd rounder for Gagner at his actual salary, let alone 4 times his salary.
The only thing--the only thing--Yakupov has going for him is the possible perception of potential. If he was judged just on merit, he'd have already washed out.[/QUOTE]
This is what still gives him value. GM's don't trade for pieces because of what they have done in the past, they trade for pieces that they think will help their team in the future. Gagner doesn't help teams win. Yakupov doesn't either, but he has the skill set to in the right situation. It's a gamble though, and teams don't like to gamble unless the cost is low - and it sounds like the Oilers aren't ready to sell low.
Makes sense . All in as in Montreal offers a Happy Meal
Can go wrong everything is included . Burger , Fries , Pop , Toy and a treat
You go "all in" if you can get the Oilers to include the swarm of bees that usually chase Yakupov.