Where should they be ranked? Perhaps you under value them
MrB1P's top 50 affiliated prospects. Volume 6.
- Thread starter Mrb1p
- Start date
18 year old kids.Not a perfect science. A little black magic ceremony in the wee hours of the night sometimes helps but the visions are clouded in mists leaving even the devine knowledge unclear
Last edited:
LeProspector
AINEC
- Feb 14, 2017
- 5,203
- 5,950
Reinbacher should be in the twenties or thirties.
Demidov should be around 5
Roy isn’t a top-50 prospect and Hutson is fine where he is. I don’t like smaller defenders so I’d have him lower but I understand people who have him in that range.
On Roy Bedard loved having him on his wing.Smart kid who keeps showing up his detractors .If they use him in the second line he will get Calder votes this year but like anything with this kid he going to gave prove his detractors wrong again
- Jul 25, 2012
- 41,408
- 37,489
I would say Roy is pretty high…. Idk where exactly I’d put him, I think he’s generally underrated prospect league wide…. But here he’s prob 10-15 spots too high
Reinbacher I Don’t think I’d have ahead of Levshunov, Dickinson, nikishin, luneau or silayev
And I think you can argue Hutson over him pretty comfortably.
It’s fun to debate the spots and obviously this is his personal list(there is obviously going to be a slight bias to his teams players if I made a top 50 I’m sure I’d have a slight ducks bias ) … interesting to see his takes and what not
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
And what's that reason? Is it the same as Stankoven? I'm getting crucified because he's so low. Is it the same as Firkus? Is it the same as reigning the Art Ross winner and former 58th overall pick? Is it the same reason as the 2021 Norris winner?
I have 3 Seattle prospects in the top ten, does that mean I'm a Seattle fan too? Or maybe the chips just fall this way?
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
I dont believe in this, again, this is a projection of their career. Matthew Wood's potential far transcends these guys no matter how bad his NCAA team was. He's on a much better team this year, I expect people that were low on him are gonna wonder why the sudden jump.
Read the criteria, and ASP isn't a slam dunk top 50 so IDK what's crazy. He still hasn't impressed in ways he should.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
It's the Seattle helium I took apparently.
More seriously though, Wrights year was fantastic and overall I do think he had a better year than those two. I expect they land around the same range in value so the difference in ranking is only reflected by numbers but not the actual small gap between like player #6 and #37. You do have to rank them at the end of the day.
Roy was putting points even without PP and much ice-time as a 20 years old. He is incredible smart player with bad skating.. I honestly don't know where to rank him.
LeProspector
AINEC
- Feb 14, 2017
- 5,203
- 5,950
No, you’re pushing your agenda. Maybe if you want to be taken more serious given this is an “annual” list. You would take the obvious bias out of it.
Then that speaks to how good Nashville's prospect pool is, because those guys are all projected to be good NHLers, Wood is more of a long term project.
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
If I rated NHL readiness higher he'd be top 4 most likely. I'm trying to rank their careers.
Yes they have an excellent prospect pool, which is very peculiar because they have a top 5 team too, love what Trotz did. The influx of talent is gonna keep them competitive a while. I think Wood has a good shot at being a star a la Robertson.
HFB ranked Branstrom and Necas in the top 3 at some point. Speaks for itself.
Appreciate the effort in these lists
There’s of course some I strongly disagree with, notably Roy, who I’m actually very high on, but certainly not that high.
I also have no idea how ASP doesn’t make a top 50 list after the season he had
There’s of course some I strongly disagree with, notably Roy, who I’m actually very high on, but certainly not that high.
I also have no idea how ASP doesn’t make a top 50 list after the season he had
Matias Maccete
Chopping up defenses
- Sep 21, 2014
- 9,726
- 3,673
Surprising to see Geekie over But and Simashev. Small sample sizes but from what I saw I liked then both a lot more than Geekie.
KevSkillz4
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2016
- 7,384
- 12,319
And according to Hfboard's I'm the most biased Habs fan.
Not really.
Not really.
that reminds me, what ever happened to that habs poster "Slafy"?
KevSkillz4
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2016
- 7,384
- 12,319
The Great Weal
Phil's Pizza
- Jan 15, 2015
- 53,809
- 68,195
Lol maybe don't complain about Habs fans being biased in other threads when you say stuff like this
- Jul 25, 2012
- 41,408
- 37,489
Watch and learn,
I already said I’d have a slight ducks bias if I made a list, and luneau is a guy I’m stubbornly high on.
CapSpace
Caufield is lit
Roy is absolutely a top-50 prospect. 2 seasons of almost 2ppg in the Q, 0.78ppg in the AHL and doesn't looked out of place during his NHL games. Will be fighting for a top 6 spot.
Stop hating.
All the guys you mentioned except Fox are forwards. And Fox is a few inches taller than Hutson and has a thicker build. Very few Dmen at Hutson’s size go on to have good NHL careers. That’s why so few teams want Hutson, he holds little value on the trade market,
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
Salary Cap: Pens Summer Salary Thread: We Hayes Dubas's offseason moves so far- Latest: Big Friggin Dummy
