There is usually room for context in most statistical-based narratives that gets tossed around when players and teams are being compared. What are the most rediculous narratives that are easily dismissed with context.
I'll start:
"Crosby's 13/14 Art Ross win was better than all Mario's six wins and all of Jagr's five wins as he had the largest % gap between him and 2nd place".
I'll start:
"Crosby's 13/14 Art Ross win was better than all Mario's six wins and all of Jagr's five wins as he had the largest % gap between him and 2nd place".