Do you think he'll have to change his game to advance? Or is it a problem of coaches trying to change his game? My instinct is that he'd be most successful using Hasek's technique/approach - but I don't know if anyone's teaching that since it's harder and 'looks strange'...
My gut says that coaches want Helle-style 'boring', positional goalies with minimal risk and minimal movement.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Helle's style, too, but I feel like there could be room for both in the NHL if it wasn't for biases - as long as it gets the job done. Hasek's technique was far less random than it looked, and was all about maximum coverage and understanding attack angles, too - but his mind could almost see it from an objective perspective and was great at anticipating/playing mind games with shooters... I believe those skills go hand in hand //(based on the sophistication of certain cognitive functions... But that's technical language from a different realm)//
I'm not a goalie expert, one of our resident goalie guru's could probably provide a better break-down. To me he is still pretty unorthodox.
Comrie likely would be a quality backup if he was 1 inch taller and a bit more broad. He's very good along the ice but NHL shooters can pick him apart up high due to his lack of size.