With the Jim Montgomery-led St Louis Blues riding a 7-game winning streak and tightening their grip on a playoff spot in the west, it had me thinking back to the end of his time in Boston. Maybe the Blues don't end up making it, but regardless it's a reminder that, whatever his flaws, this guy can coach.
But he was gone from the Bruins only a little over a month into the season, with the team already a mess and Monty spending the last two weeks looking for all the world like a guy just waiting to be fired so he could flee to greener pastures.
The hockey world moves fast and events tend to be swiftly forgotten, such that Monty's firing already feels like a long time ago. But with Boston's season dribbling its way to a miserable end, I don't think the whole saga should just be cast aside, and it's worth revisiting. The full story of what went down hasn't even begun to be told. How did things get so bad so quickly between the Bruins and a guy who so far has coached his team to the playoffs in every season he's been the man in charge? Leaving us with Joe Average Sacco who's done his best but simply isn't a top-level coach in this league.
This is not me questioning with hindsight whether the firing was the right call - I think it was, and it frankly had to be done - more thinking about how on earth things were allowed to get to that point, and so quickly? Clearly mistakes were made and there was a breakdown in relationships, both between Monty and management and between the coach and the players. It was damaging for the franchise and the consequences may linger for some time yet. There should be some accountability for that.
So with the passing of some time, any fresh thoughts or perspectives?
(mods please merge this somewhere else if more suitable - couldn't find the right thread for it)
But he was gone from the Bruins only a little over a month into the season, with the team already a mess and Monty spending the last two weeks looking for all the world like a guy just waiting to be fired so he could flee to greener pastures.
The hockey world moves fast and events tend to be swiftly forgotten, such that Monty's firing already feels like a long time ago. But with Boston's season dribbling its way to a miserable end, I don't think the whole saga should just be cast aside, and it's worth revisiting. The full story of what went down hasn't even begun to be told. How did things get so bad so quickly between the Bruins and a guy who so far has coached his team to the playoffs in every season he's been the man in charge? Leaving us with Joe Average Sacco who's done his best but simply isn't a top-level coach in this league.
This is not me questioning with hindsight whether the firing was the right call - I think it was, and it frankly had to be done - more thinking about how on earth things were allowed to get to that point, and so quickly? Clearly mistakes were made and there was a breakdown in relationships, both between Monty and management and between the coach and the players. It was damaging for the franchise and the consequences may linger for some time yet. There should be some accountability for that.
So with the passing of some time, any fresh thoughts or perspectives?
(mods please merge this somewhere else if more suitable - couldn't find the right thread for it)
Last edited: