I don’t understand the logic behind the Habs trading their best Goalie prospect that theoretically steps in to replace Price in a few years and take back waiver fodder in Hutchinson
so they can acquire a fairly useless asset like Ritchie? Weird concept
If the basic idea was the get Chariot then just do him for the 2nd
I can understand what the OP was thinking though...
- Montreal should trade Chiarot for a 2nd.
- Leafs can't afford to take on Chiarot's $3.5m unless Holl & Ritchie go the other way.
- Montreal would gladly take on Holl & Ritchie, but realize they're not going to get Holl, Ritchie & a 2nd for Chiarot.
- So, fire in Adam Brooks (to replace Ritchie on the Leafs roster), and do the Hutchninson-Primeau swap to try and make up for the value difference.
Ultimately, all of these pieces make the deal far too convoluted, and require / ask the Leafs to do things that they likely don't want to do (ditch Ritchie, give up one of their 3 remaining picks).
The concept of Holl <-> Chiarot does make some sort of sense given that Holl has an extra year on the deal, and Chiarot is probably a little better right now... but it requires the Habs to place a pretty substantial value on Holl's extra year, as from a Leaf standpoint, all you can really do is Chiarot at $1.5m - $1.75m retained for Holl plus a 2023 3rd and/or a prospect.
To the average fan on hfboards, a 2022 2nd at the deadline is probably more appealing, Montreal may look at the fact that they've got a bunch of picks already this year, so want to turn things around sooner than that.