Proposal: Montreal / LAK

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
:habs
Trevor Moore LW - 8 Goals / 22 Points 3 Years Left 4.2M
Trevor Lewis RW - 3 Goals / 7 Points UFA 800k

:kings
Josh Anderson RW - 8 Goals / 18 Points 2 Years Left 5.5M
Joel Armia RW - 10 Goals / 24 Points UFA 3.4M
Why does LA do this - and that's while thinking Armia will be a good tdl acquisition.
 
:habs
Trevor Moore LW - 8 Goals / 22 Points 3 Years Left 4.2M
Trevor Lewis RW - 3 Goals / 7 Points UFA 800k

:kings
Josh Anderson RW - 8 Goals / 18 Points 2 Years Left 5.5M
Joel Armia RW - 10 Goals / 24 Points UFA 3.4M
Overall it's not bad. I think it's more we prefer our stuff and Armia possibly along with Evans can return something nice.
 
I'll do it for Ryder, Halak, and a 2nd.
idontbelieveyou.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: EquivalentStay
Its a no go from Montreal. Armia and Anderson are 2 likables assets. They can be traded but for assets that we need

counter

Armia
Anderson 50% retained
BOS 4th rd

vs

Danault 50% retained
LAK 3rd
This seems to imply Josh Anderson is comparable as an asset to Danault
 
Not happening without some serious incentive added on LA side. There is none at the moment, and MTL loses a trade chip to get better picks in Armia.
 
Neither team does this..and as a Montreal fan, an even smaller team somehow gets smaller; so it's not a good idea.
They'll probably move on from Armia but I think Anderson will stick around until the last year of his contract - and habs figure out a way to make sure the bottom six can play a heavier, grittier game.

i'm pretty sure this is why the OP wants these players
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad