GDT: Montreal Canadiens vs Columbus Blue Jackets- 2/26/15 7:00pm EST SNE, RDS, TSN 690

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nashy

Living on Fish Island
Feb 2, 2006
19,135
2,607
Toronto
If you want to beat the Habs, just hang out by the hash marks....nobody will cover you.
 

Boardish

Registered User
Mar 3, 2004
4,486
2,472
If it comes to rest on the top of the net, you're not supposed to be able to play it to get it off.

We got scored on in 2011 when a Hurricanes' player got the puck from the top of the net.

The rule 85.2 was used back then.

I felt it was incredibly stupid.

85.2 Puck Unplayable - When the puck becomes lodged in the netting on
the outside of either goal so as to make it unplayable, or if it is “frozenâ€
between opposing players intentionally or otherwise, the Referee shall
stop the play.
The puck may be played off the goal netting by either team.
However, should the puck remain on the goal netting for more than
three (3) seconds, play shall be stopped. Should the goalkeeper use
his stick or glove to freeze the puck on the back of the net or should a
defending player shield an attacking player from playing the puck off
the back of the net, the face-off shall take place at one of the face-off
spots in the defending zone.
Should the puck go under the goal either from behind or the side,
or through the mesh from behind or the side, if this is witnessed by an
on-ice official, play should be stopped immediately and the ensuing
face-off should take place at the nearest face-off spot in the zone
nearest to the location where the play was stopped.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,016
72,545
Texas
For as great as the Habs played in the 1st, they are playing equally as bad in the second.
 

Riddick412

Crash da net!
Dec 15, 2011
6,691
6,216
Ottawa
We got scored on in 2011 when a Hurricanes' player got the puck from the top of the net.

The rule 85.2 was used back then.

I felt it was incredibly stupid.

85.2 Puck Unplayable - When the puck becomes lodged in the netting on
the outside of either goal so as to make it unplayable, or if it is “frozenâ€
between opposing players intentionally or otherwise, the Referee shall
stop the play.
The puck may be played off the goal netting by either team.
However, should the puck remain on the goal netting for more than
three (3) seconds, play shall be stopped. Should the goalkeeper use
his stick or glove to freeze the puck on the back of the net or should a
defending player shield an attacking player from playing the puck off
the back of the net, the face-off shall take place at one of the face-off
spots in the defending zone.
Should the puck go under the goal either from behind or the side,
or through the mesh from behind or the side, if this is witnessed by an
on-ice official, play should be stopped immediately and the ensuing
face-off should take place at the nearest face-off spot in the zone
nearest to the location where the play was stopped.

I'm glad you posted this, I didn't want to look it up myself :)
 

Ohashi_Jouzu*

Registered User
Apr 2, 2007
30,332
11
Halifax
We got scored on in 2011 when a Hurricanes' player got the puck from the top of the net.

The rule 85.2 was used back then.

I felt it was incredibly stupid.

85.2 Puck Unplayable - When the puck becomes lodged in the netting on
the outside of either goal so as to make it unplayable, or if it is “frozen”
between opposing players intentionally or otherwise, the Referee shall
stop the play.
The puck may be played off the goal netting by either team.
However, should the puck remain on the goal netting for more than
three (3) seconds, play shall be stopped. Should the goalkeeper use
his stick or glove to freeze the puck on the back of the net or should a
defending player shield an attacking player from playing the puck off
the back of the net, the face-off shall take place at one of the face-off
spots in the defending zone.
Should the puck go under the goal either from behind or the side,
or through the mesh from behind or the side, if this is witnessed by an
on-ice official, play should be stopped immediately and the ensuing
face-off should take place at the nearest face-off spot in the zone
nearest to the location where the play was stopped.

I thought the top of the net was treated differently than the lower netting because above the crossbar around the net = high stick anyway. You've got me thinking that I just made that up now, though.

edit: okay, so at least I didn't totally make that up. They commented on it during the intermission (not in rules explicitly, but that's how it has been called for a while).
 
Last edited:

Riddick412

Crash da net!
Dec 15, 2011
6,691
6,216
Ottawa
I thought the top of the net was treated differently than the lower netting because above the crossbar around the net = high stick anyway. You've got me thinking that I just made that up now, though.

I think high stick is above the shoulders. High stick on a goal is above the crossbar.
Plus I think the puck was popped up from someone's stick under the mesh.

Either way it would have been a BS goal.
 

Nashy

Living on Fish Island
Feb 2, 2006
19,135
2,607
Toronto
For as great as the Habs played in the 1st, they are playing equally as bad in the second.

Yep, complete role reversal from earlier in the season, when they sucked in the first, and started coming on in the second....it's da new system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad