Mo to Left Wing Forward

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Will it work?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 7.2%
  • No

    Votes: 70 72.2%
  • May as well try

    Votes: 20 20.6%

  • Total voters
    97
I'd put an asterisk on that. The Leafs seem to try the positionless hockey philosophy with Marner on the blueline on the PP, so it wouldn't be much of stretch if Rielly started playing a little out of position on the PP or they threw him out there in a pinch with the Tavares duo. But it would be unlikely since the status of a 1D going to forward would be tough "politically."

I think there's a big difference though between doing something like that for a shift or two in desperate attempt to win a game vs having him be there long term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buds17 and Kiwi
I think there's a big difference though between doing something like that for a shift or two in desperate attempt to win a game vs having him be there long term.

Not sure if the D to LW move was proposed as a permanent move or a temporary measure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
In those days you usually had four D playing most of each game, and we already had Horton, Stanley, Brewer, and Baun. That's a tough top four for anyone to crack.

Also, Red was brought in to be a shutdown player, which isn't Rielly's forte.

A better (not great) example would be Wendel Clark or even Ian White.
Or Gary Leeman? Toronto has actually done this a fair bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: notDatsyuk
Why always the wing? Why not think outside the box, throw caution to the wind, and make him a bloody center?

That might revolutionize the game.
 
How about we dress him up like a referee and have him make a bunch of calls in our favor before anyone catches on
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Buds17
The real question is why are you answering a question with a question to avoid answering a question?
That would be what you're doing, not me.
Exceptions are exceptions for a reason, and shouldn't be the expectation just because you got bored and wanted to mess with the roster. Rielly is doing perfectly well in their current position, he has never played that other position before in his life, and his skillset matches his current position much better. We have no reason to start flip flopping him around.
So no, the real question is why you're trying so hard to force Rielly into being the exception, for no reason.
 
As far as I know there's only 2 Leafs that I can think of that started as a Defenceman and ended playing forward:

Red Kelly
Wendel Clark

When you think of all the thousands of players that have gone through TOR and the NHL, how many have made the switch to a different position?

The number (percentage) must be minuscule.

I suppose it's possible with Rielly, but doubtful.

We'd all love a legend moment like Red Kelly to happen, but that's so rare.
 
As far as I know there's only 2 Leafs that I can think of that started as a Defenceman and ended playing forward:

Red Kelly
Wendel Clark

When you think of all the thousands of players that have gone through TOR and the NHL, how many have made the switch to a different position?

The number (percentage) must be minuscule.

I suppose it's possible with Rielly, but doubtful.

We'd all love a legend moment like Red Kelly to happen, but that's so rare.
Gary Leeman scored 50 goals after being converted to a winger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ianturnedbull
That would be what you're doing, not me.
Exceptions are exceptions for a reason, and shouldn't be the expectation just because you got bored and wanted to mess with the roster. Rielly is doing perfectly well in their current position, he has never played that other position before in his life, and his skillset matches his current position much better. We have no reason to start flip flopping him around.
So no, the real question is why you're trying so hard to force Rielly into being the exception, for no reason.

Why am I trying so hard? How am I trying so hard? Specifically what did I say that has you thinking that I'm trying so hard? Do you understand what it means to try hard? I'm not sure you do.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad