Mitch is untouchable in my books! A special player who can't be replaced really!
you oughta watch this kid, cause you're missing a whole lotAlso one is not like the other. Laine is a pure goal scorer 40 goals 20ish assists. Marner has 19 goals. But I wouldn't trade petro for either. Also kane and laine are elite wingers, Marner hasn't hit that status yet.
Your comparing him to players that are far superior to him and calling him elite. Laine, kane are elite. But like I said I wouldn't trade petro nor parayko for marner. He is a 19 - 20 goal scorin winger who is a defensive liability. So much that Babcock has had to move him down the lineup several times. I have seen him play he is impressive but he hasn't proven he us worth an elite dman. Do Please EXPLAUN HIW He isyou oughta watch this kid, cause you're missing a whole lot
Your comparing him to players that are far superior to him and calling him elite. Laine, kane are elite. But like I said I wouldn't trade petro nor parayko for marner. He is a 19 - 20 goal scorin winger who is a defensive liability. So much that Babcock has had to move him down the lineup several times. I have seen him play he is impressive but he hasn't proven he us worth an elite dman. Do Please EXPLAUN HIW He is
Your comparing him to players that are far superior to him and calling him elite. Laine, kane are elite. But like I said I wouldn't trade petro nor parayko for marner. He is a 19 - 20 goal scorin winger who is a defensive liability. So much that Babcock has had to move him down the lineup several times. I have seen him play he is impressive but he hasn't proven he us worth an elite dman. Do Please EXPLAUN HIW He is
Your comparing him to players that are far superior to him and calling him elite. Laine, kane are elite. But like I said I wouldn't trade petro nor parayko for marner. He is a 19 - 20 goal scorin winger who is a defensive liability. So much that Babcock has had to move him down the lineup several times. I have seen him play he is impressive but he hasn't proven he us worth an elite dman. Do Please EXPLAUN HIW He is
Once again he is not elite, he maybe in future but he is not now. His numbers don't prove it. I get it your high on him nothing wrong with that. I also know defense is usually something learned for young forward studs.obviously i can't seeing as you've already cast you're opinion in stone, but you entitled to that opinion even if it is wrong
see defensive liability for an example
young Mitch is driving the Leaf bus atm, and anybody who has watched the Leafs since December knows that and also knows that he is no liability...he had a rough start to the season which killed his +/- but since december has put up 44 pts in 46 games, as a comparable Laine has put up 49 in 46; 5 points difference, not as far apart as you thought huh?
While you seem to think that he's not as good as whomever you wish to name right now, chances are he will be the better player by mid season next year
someone said earlier in this thread that he's the best playmaker in toronto since doug gilmour...that is no exaggeration and Marner is elite
The part were he doesn't play defense very well to the point that Babcock feels he needs to continually move him down the line up. Which by the way dedense is learned for most stud young forwards. Or the fact that he had 19 goals last year and has 19 this year. Both are factsWill never take anything i read from you seriously again.
Why even post? I mean, what’s the point, just say i’m partial to my players and don’t know enough to speak about the other guy.
Also kane broke 100 pts that's something most players don't do.what would you give me Patrick Laine? Patrick Kane? Better yet what do you think would be the return, a second pairing guy and a pick?
Your comparing him to players that are far superior to him and calling him elite. Laine, kane are elite. But like I said I wouldn't trade petro nor parayko for marner. He is a 19 - 20 goal scorin winger who is a defensive liability. So much that Babcock has had to move him down the lineup several times. I have seen him play he is impressive but he hasn't proven he us worth an elite dman. Do Please EXPLAUN HIW He is
Do tell how parayko is a number three, gets 20+ mins secoND best defenseman on our team and has better stats than Morgan reily. So if that makes him a number 3 then marner is a 3rd liner lol.You wouldn't trade a number #3 dman in Parayko for Marner?
Do tell how parayko is a number three, gets 20+ mins secoND best defenseman on our team and has better stats than Morgan reily. So if that makes him a number 3 then marner is a 3rd liner lol.
Do tell how parayko is a number three, gets 20+ mins secoND best defenseman on our team and has better stats than Morgan reily. So if that makes him a number 3 then marner is a 3rd liner lol.
I was talking bout marner I didn't bring parayko into this. I just stated a 60 70 point winger doesn't get you an elite (top10) dman. They starred getting crazyJust let it go... we don't need every main board trade proposal post to have 3-4 pages of you back and forth going on and on while throwing jabs back at them. People think Parayko is a #3 guy? Fine it's an opinion, there's no reason to keep pouring gasoline on to fires that just piss everybody off.
This again? Weekly thread topic. Untouchable as per Leaf Fans.
If he's so good and better than Morgan Rielly, why are the Blues about to miss the playoffs?
Team can't score, injuries, Allen can't stop a puck, the list goes on and on. Has zero to do with parayko or how he has played.If he's so good and better than Morgan Rielly, why are the Blues about to miss the playoffs?
I'm posting because your delusional if marner gets you an elite #1 d. Please show where a young 60 70 pt 20g wUnger got you a top 10 dman in the league....show your math please
The post and commenter said trade for elite dman that's top 10-15 in league which at this point he is not. He could be that guy but he just isn't yet. That's my point. Elite wingers don't get elite dman.Did I say Marner gets us an Elite #1 D? No, I said, well I asked but it was rhetorical, why you would bother posting about a player you clearly don’t know much about.
You cite an occurrence (though you say it was multiple times) where Marner was dropped to the 4th line during a slump early in his sophomore season, and reason it’s because he’s a defensive liability - It wasn’t.
You also cite a stat line without any context and assume that’s who he is - it isn’t.
He’s been PPG for over half the season getting 16minutes as the offensive driver of his line. He’s also something like 6th in the league in takeaway differential, has great possession stats, backchecks and battles for pucks along the boards. He’s also good on the PK (when he gets the opportunity)and has shown a willingness to block shots when necessary. He is also a decent face off option.
A 20 goal 60 point player is what he is at 16 minutes a night, and after a slump that lasted near a quarter of the season.