Mitch Marner, Yet Again

Be interesting to see how many points Nylander and marner would have together.

Both skate well, both excellent passers, both apparently healthy with no built in excuses.
That would be great until the mean players looked sideways at them. They would throw the puck away as fast as their sticks would flex
 
Be interesting to see how many points Nylander and marner would have together.

Both skate well, both excellent passers, both apparently healthy with no built in excuses.

Those two have never really been tried together (positions factored in).
 
Because it hadn't happened when he signed his contract.

"100 points seasons" is pointless and arbitrary. And Pastrnak didn't even have any 100 point seasons when he signed anyway.
I agree that 100 point seasons are pointless because at 28 ish years old Marner has none.
I have jumped into the middle of an already raging debate I’m assume something to do with when they signed their contracts.
My bad as I thought it was about who is the best player…….clearly Pastrnak
 
I agree that 100 point seasons are pointless because at 28 ish years old Marner has none.
I have jumped into the middle of an already raging debate I’m assume something to do with when they signed their contracts.
My bad as I thought it was about who is the best player…….clearly Pastrnak

Marner shouldn't sit at the same table as Pasta. He is way better
 
No, the discussion is about observation and isolating different variables around the team. How many more years of observation and revolving cast of personnel with the exact same results before targeting the only constants?

By and large it’s a Matthews and Marner led problem with a revolving door of everything else. Completely interchangeable.

I don’t think that’s fair to put on them. Kadri being traded for example had nothing to do with them. That was Dubas trying to rush a deal.

Connor Brown being moved had to do with us signing Patrick Marleau to a big deal.

Lou Lam had a pre arranged agreement with Shanny to only be the GM for 3 years. That was before Matthews was even drafted.

Even Bunting, he was good fit on our top line, they just didn’t want to bring him back.

We could through that list and find very little was a direct result of them.


To me that’s a management problem. They have sucked at finding the right mix around these guys. Yeah the Matthews and Marner under perform in the playoffs but it’s not their job to find the right supporting cast. That’s management and it’s been a failure of epic proportions by Shanahan and his staff at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al14 and arso40
Because it hadn't happened when he signed his contract.

"100 points seasons" is pointless and arbitrary. And Pastrnak didn't even have any 100 point seasons when he signed anyway.
2 things that are continually talked about in hockey. first to 50 goals and first to 100pts every season. Just like a 1000 yard rushers and receivers in football, 50 home runs in baseball. It’s a benchmark. It moves you into another level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40 and thewave
I don’t think that’s fair to put on them. Kadri being traded for example had nothing to do with them. That was Dubas trying to rush a deal.

Connor Brown being moved had to do with us signing Patrick Marleau to a big deal.

Lou Lam had a pre arranged agreement with Shanny to only be the GM for 3 years. That was before Matthews was even drafted.

Even Bunting, he was good fit on our top line, they just didn’t want to bring him back.

We could through that list and find very little was a direct result of them.

It's not about assigning blame to the outgoing pieces man, it's different variables and combinations and the same on ice flaws year over year. It's a core player problem since they are constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: arso40 and thewave
2 things that are continually talked about in hockey. first to 50 goals and first to 100pts every season.
It's a fun benchmark and story for fans to follow and cheer for, but ultimately meaningless. There is no meaningful difference between 99 and 100 points. It's just an easy round number.
 
In terms of physical winning playoff style hockey, bringing Mitch Marner along is like bringing a butter knife to a gun fight,


1742140130211.png
 
I don't see a world where Marner stays where he isn't massively overpaid. Like 14.5 a year. Why would he? Not that he was unfairly treated, but if he thought it was toxic before.... Sign for another over payment and see
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40 and ToneDog
If if didn’t mean much then why do players play meaningless games to try and achieve it?
They don't. Marner, for example, took a game off to rest for the playoffs while sitting at 99 points. Also, just because it's meaningless in the sense of representing relative player quality, that doesn't mean players don't enjoy chasing benchmarks.
 
How is he tone deaf? Who the f*** wants to go play in Carolina. Not even Rantanen wanted to stay there? The owner is cheap as hell, they won’t land any big free agents. I don’t blame Marner at all. Carolina isn’t a desirable destination.

At least with Colorado he has some familiarity with Nathan MacKinnon and a few other guys. I honestly think Marner would have waived to go there, if that was presented earlier, with time for him to think about it.
If you believe Friedman Avs offered Ranta $11.75m. Do you think Avs are offering Marner more than what they offered Rantanen? Do you think Marner would sign there for that or less?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sundinisagod
That would be great until the mean players looked sideways at them. They would throw the puck away as fast as their sticks would flex
No, perhaps one of them is prone to making prayer passes, but Nylander will go to the tough positions to score. Defence he'll leave to others, but one of them is supposed to be Selke level right?

Missing ingredient is the center, but maybe use the Tavares money for that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Racer88 and arso40
adding hide avatars option

Ad

Ad