Mess
Global Moderator
"A leopard never changes its spots".I do think a shorter term contract does make sense for a team acquiring Marner - there's a lot of baggage and failures you're inheriting; a shorter term deal lets you suss out whether the specialist in failure was a Mitch problem, a Toronto/core 4 problem, or some combination of both.
Marner is as soft a perimeter player that avoids contract at all cost when possible that there this is in the game. Since Marner doesn't score because he isn't willing to go to the dirty areas and play in traffic, something that hasn't changed in the last decade since he was drafted, is not suddenly going to change based on his new linemates either.
He is also a "playmaker" because scoring a mere 13 goals after 9 playoff years and 11 series in not a small sample size to allow one to draw conclusions from past performance that believe a change of scenery will alter that.
Again since Marner only succeeds as a point producer when his teammates provide the goals and finishing so he can run up the assists totals that makes him a secondary scorer not primary.. So think of another team where he would ride shotgun to a Rocket Richard trophy winner like Matthews and on a PP the also has Nylander and Tavares on it etc. Matthews when healthy is capable of 60 goals and Willy and JT are each 35-45 goal scorers.
There are very few teams in the NHL that can match the Leafs offensive talent. So less goal scorers/finishers is more likely to produce Less points from assists than More.
Marner enters a new team based on his past performance and reputation. Marner is assuming little risk on a new short-term deal, because even if next team walks away, the next team will line up to think things will be different.
