Nylander has given up on many puck battles because someone was going to hit him, Marner is not even close to that level.
They both primarily use their stick and avoid contact because other parts of their game are better, which is fine, wouldn't critique either for this, but Nylander bailing on pucks in the corner to not get hit is exclusive to him.
Agreed, both players tend to avoid physical contact and do not engage heavily in board battles.
However, when comparing overall impact, Nylander has the edge in several key areas.
Why Nylander is better:
- Offers more offensive versatility; capable of both scoring and playmaking.
- An elite skater with excellent top-end speed
-Can generate offense with or without elite linemates.
- Among the top two? in goals per 60 minutes in the playoffs over the past few years.
- 20 pounds heavier. Harder to knock off the puck; occasionally drives the net and uses his strength effectively.
- Handles media very well.
- Rarely commits costly giveaways or critical errors.
Marner Better:
- Brings consistent effort and rarely takes shifts off.
- Stronger overall defensive impact, although he can be prone to high-risk giveaways in crucial moments.
Ive noticed Marner has a tendency to not be able to move with the puck in the offensive zone. If he shoots, its stationary, if its a pass, its stationary. Etc etc its likely due to his lack of speed and strength..he doesnt have the skills necessary to do it.
Nylander though does and can.