Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 21,180
- 11,112
Perhaps neither.Did the Leafs offer 13.5 and Marner reject it, or did Marner ask for that and the Leafs refuse?
This was also before the Rantanen situation.
Perhaps neither.Did the Leafs offer 13.5 and Marner reject it, or did Marner ask for that and the Leafs refuse?
This was also before the Rantanen situation.
...we dropped 2 spots for a year of AJ + Kap. It's honestly pretty strong asset management, but Jarvis was a solid pick and likely a top 3 player in a redraft.Problem a Clueless Dubas gave away Leafs #13 overall to dump Marleau to re-sign RFA Kapanen and A. Johnsson and they both sucked and were dumped a year later.
A 23 year old Seth Jarvis has already scored more playoff goals 19, than Mitch Marner has his entire career. (13 total). I'd rather have Seth Jarvis than Mitch Marner today.
View attachment 1044937
When did he refuse 13.5 million?That's supposedly his saving grace? He refused a 13.5m contract which would have made him 2nd highest paid?
Ludicrous
Or the DNA talk was not about Marner, and some people assumed it was.Even if Marner does want to come back…so the Leafs want him? I don’t think so.
Unless that whole DNA talk was bs.
Well last years fake press conference about patience is up and the patterns indicate change is needed was bogus so we will see how much BS the DNA statement was by July.Even if Marner does want to come back…so the Leafs want him? I don’t think so.
Unless that whole DNA talk was bs.
Or the DNA talk was not about Marner, and some people assumed it was.
Did he try to trade him to Vegas?Treliving tried to trade him to Vegas before the season and to Carolina during the season so perhaps the writing about re-signing was already known.
Maybe changing the DNA is just saving face?
Did he try to trade him to Vegas?
Yes, Marner was asked to waive to Carolina.
Perhaps.
Maybe.
Walking away from Marner allowing a 100 point player to exit for free, because you would prefer the recaptured cap space, certainly would speak volume's and leave no doubt whom the DNA quote was referencing.Treliving tried to trade him to Vegas before the season and to Carolina during the season so perhaps the writing about re-signing was already known.
Maybe changing the DNA is just saving face?
I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if he took a smaller pay cut just so that he could be a bus-rider on a stacked team a la Kevin Durant. He knows that he doesn't have what it takes to be THE guy on a contender.
Kyle Dubas already set this man up with generational wealth before he had proven anything of substantial value, so he can clearly afford to lose out on a couple of millions if it means that he ends up on a contender.
Does he have to waive in order to trade his rights ? Seem like a pending UFA should not have a say since he is a UFA in 4 weeks.There is still an option here that guarantees 100% certainty of success.
If you try to trade him to Vegas and they says "NO", and you try to trade him to Carolina and he says "NO".
Then I wonder if GM Treliving has approached Marner and his agent Ferris, about the idea of a Sign-&-Trade to any one of the other 31 teams of Marner's choice where he would like to continue his career next?
Then nobody will be saying "NO" and problem solved.![]()
I would love for Brad to replace Tavares with Bennett and Marner with Ehlers and Granlund.I have that feeling as well, with the caveat that Rogers may want to run it back being as unimaginative as they are…
I could also see an alternative solution where we get Marner back (not that I want it) and sign Bennett (notice how it was clarified he was looking at $7.5 million and not $10 million) but Tavares gets pushed out the door.
This is my thought as well, the Matthews Marner combo might be too strongOr the DNA talk was not about Marner, and some people assumed it was.
Does he have to waive in order to trade his rights ? Seem like a pending UFA should not have a say since he is a UFA in 4 weeks.
Understand but you are not trading the player and the player is not moving. You are pretty much giving a team the right to talk to him before July 1. He doesn't have to listen or he could agree to a new 8 year deal.The contract runs out July 1
Yes, he has to agree to any movement.Does he have to waive in order to trade his rights ? Seem like a pending UFA should not have a say since he is a UFA in 4 weeks.
I feel like Marner doesn’t have the total conviction to leave Toronto. He’s alluding to leaving by going to July 1, seeing what’s out there etc. but its carefully crafted language, not closing the door. He’a not making a definitive statement he’s 100% leaving, and he could if he was just so over the experience.
Personally, I'd sign Marner and Bennett, see about moving Matthews and set the team up so that it screams "CONNER, COME HOME! We'll even let you play with the same guys you did at the 4 Nations tournament if you want!"I have that feeling as well, with the caveat that Rogers may want to run it back being as unimaginative as they are…
I could also see an alternative solution where we get Marner back (not that I want it) and sign Bennett (notice how it was clarified he was looking at $7.5 million and not $10 million) but Tavares gets pushed out the door.
Yep. He's going to wait and see what the offers are before deciding, which is smart and he's earned that right. But I also think the Leafs have some leverage here because he probably doesn't want to move away from his family with a young baby right now. Who knows, we'll see.
If it goes to July 1st., how much Cap Space will the Leafs have on July 2nd.?
Yes, however the way around this obstacle is the allow teams to approach him in advance with the Leafs giving permission in advance of July 1st.Does he have to waive in order to trade his rights ? Seem like a pending UFA should not have a say since he is a UFA in 4 weeks.
Just like the supposed offer sheets it’s all BS from the advance Mitchy negotiating cabal………When did he refuse 13.5 million?