arso40
Registered User
- Jun 7, 2022
- 2,975
- 3,460
Ty my friendNice sentence structure, very compelling. Stick to laugh emojis someone else created.




Ty my friendNice sentence structure, very compelling. Stick to laugh emojis someone else created.
I think you missed the point there, CAPS LOCKIt's true, the frothers have never made much sense but it's gone to another level lately.![]()
My biggest fear heading into this series, was that it would look the way it did in game 4 - just pushed around and bullied and forechecked to death, and the usual suspects looking completely uncomfortable in that grindy, physical game.Yeah, it's a bit of a recurring trend, isn't it? Other team finds another gear, overtakes us in the passing lane, and we can't match their intensity in the big moments. You'd just hope that at some point a switch would flip in their heads and you'd see some of that piss and vinegar that fuels chowderheads like Marchand.
I don't think Marner would agree to this as it would be considered a payout in terms of cap percentage and I think it would fall below Nylander's cap percentage too. Perhaps he would do a very short term deal at that number then cash in on the rising cap, like Matthews will.I've thought all along a 8x$12.5 deal would be cleanest and easiest to get done for both sides.
It's not a problem switching Willy to his off wing, but I don’t see how putting the player with the most assists with the two best goal scorers is "making three scoring lines".I’ve been saying it for a while. Put JT with Willy and Marner,
Give Matthews Domi and Knies, put Patches back with McMann.
You then have three scoring lines. There was one time I think last season they tried JT-Willy and Marner together for a shift or two and they played really well. I’d like to see it again.
We saw the one shift they had JT with Marner and Knies not only did they have a ton of Possesion, but the cycle game was solid and Knies almost scored at the end of a cycle when the pass came through from down low. Matthews and Marner’s game don’t really compliment each other any more. Matthews wants to score off the rush, Marner likes possession and passing, JT likes to cycle, he and Marner’s game are way more complimentary
What do you mean by 'payout' ?I don't think Marner would agree to this as it would be considered a payout in terms of cap percentage and I think it would fall below Nylander's cap percentage too. Perhaps he would do a very short term deal at that number then cash in on the rising cap, like Matthews will.
I meant pay cut. Shouldn't have spelled it as one word as autocorrect changed it to payout.What do you mean by 'payout' ?
I think most assume 8 years but it may be beneficial to both sides to do a shorter term. Negotiations should be interesting anyway.
Got it, now that I read it again 'paycut' should have been obviousI meant pay cut. Shouldn't have spelled it as one word as autocorrect changed it to payout.
When discussing Marner's next deal, if with Toronto, I think we need to use his and Nylander's current cap % as baselines. With a heavily rising cap there is no chance he's taking a smaller % on a long term deal. Might as well use 13m as an absolute bare minimum starting point as he will want at least some sort of raise. Personally I'm guessing it will be 13 x 3. Agree with you about a short term deal being better for both sides.
LOL of course it does cause the player is clearly more important than the teamGot it, now that I read it again 'paycut' should have been obvious
I don't think either side would think he should be taking a paycut,13 as a start seems reasonable.
Looking forward to this all being put to bed. I really think Marner made a mistake in how he handled this whole thing but that will be soon forgotten once a new deal is signed.
This is why 13 mill or even a resign at any number makes zero sense unless he can change this narrative anyone who wants to pay millions of dollars for a player like this is out to lunch I would think we’re talkin about jarnkrok not the superstar Mitch LOLMarner has a long-time reputation now of checking out in a playoff series in critical games #5-7, providing very little offense in series deciding games.
Marner's career stats of 20 games 0 goals 6 assists 6 points in those games.
These might be the biggest upcoming games for Marner in terms of his Leafs future.
Which Marner will we see as Leafs attempt to advance to round #3?
MARKERS BEEN PLAYING LIKE GARBAGE wanna pay increase play like it stop crying and Start moving your feet and playing to your potential for once In the playoffs still waiting for that signature game Hes been our 5 best player this playoffs not a good thing
Marner has a long-time reputation now of checking out in a playoff series in critical games #5-7, providing very little offense in series deciding games.
Marner's career stats of 20 games 0 goals 6 assists 6 points in those games.
Which Marner will we see as Leafs attempt to advance to round #3?
Hope the greed bites him in the ass and puts him in the gym…….cant just rely on just smarts and skillEvery GM negotiating a contract with him this summer (assuming Tre isn't the only one) should lead the negotiations with that stat and put Bitchy Mitchy in his place.
We all know the answer to that one.
it's 5 o'clock somewhere...Loooooool f*** eh![]()
Even if Marner goes ballistic from a production standpoint in those games, it's still not enough evidence for me to flip the script. I'd consider it more of a one off than the norm, given his history. I wouldn't be sold on committing 8 more years.Marner has a long-time reputation now of checking out in a playoff series in critical games #5-7, providing very little offense in series deciding games.
Marner's career stats of 20 games 0 goals 6 assists 6 points in those games.
These might be the biggest upcoming games for Marner in terms of his Leafs future.
Which Marner will we see as Leafs attempt to advance to round #3?
To add to my post above....Berube isnt being as protective as Keefe. First playoffs and hes already called Marner out as having warts to his play.Toronto coach Craig Berube was sanguine about what the team has been getting from Matthews, especially considering that he might be playing through an injury, but he was less so about Marner.
Sometimes your top guys, they're looking to get too good of a chance sometimes instead of just putting the puck on net," he said Monday. "I think there's times where we could put more pucks on net at angles, bad angles, just firing it in there with people going to the net. You never know, it goes off somebody, rebounds or anything like that.
"I think Mitch could just be a little bit more direct in that area. He has the puck a lot, we know that, and he's got to look to put more pucks to the net. I get what he's trying to do, he wants to upgrade his chance, upgrade the chance. He's a passer first, we know that, but we need him to shoot pucks too. So yeah, I agree with you on that. Two games without a shot, he's got to shoot the puck."
When it comes to re-signing his 100+ point season(18 more than the next closest) plus being leaned on in all situations will be given the most weight in the negotiations.Even if Marner goes ballistic from a production standpoint in those games, it's still not enough evidence for me to flip the script. I'd consider it more of a one off than the norm, given his history. I wouldn't be sold on committing 8 more years.
Nah. Never worth 13-14m.When it comes to re-signing his 100+ point season(18 more than the next closest) plus being leaned on in all situations will be given the most weight in the negotiations.
Not sure, depends on the cap percentage.Nah. Never worth 13-14m.
For a franchise that hasn’t been close to winning the Cup since the 60s, I believe you. Fans seems content on not winning either, so it’s a great matchWhen it comes to re-signing his 100+ point season(18 more than the next closest) plus being leaned on in all situations will be given the most weight in the negotiations.
Again, for a team and fan base not interested in winning games in the playoffs, that seems about rightNot sure, depends on the cap percentage.
He's no doubt closer to Matthews than Nylander on the pecking order, look forward to having this resolved and having our answer.
Nah. Never worth 13-14m.
Not sure, depends on the cap percentage.
He's no doubt closer to Matthews than Nylander on the pecking order, look forward to having this resolved and having our answer.