TopCheeseShotta
Registered User
- Mar 1, 2020
- 344
- 915
If he performs like him, why not? If he doesn’t he can STFU about asking for a ridiculous 14 millionWhy is he worth Rantanen's money again?
I'm not accepting anymore of these f***ing fairlytales about Marner allegedly being a better player. He deserves less and he should be paid less.
Not true. He doesn’t have to pay state income tax which averages about 4.5 %, but tgey have other taxes in Texas as well as federal taxes.He got 12.5 tax free.
Not the same
With those stats is any player worth that?Look what Rantanen did tonight - 3 goals 1 assist in game 7. That is money well spent
How could Marner possibly think he’s worth more than that guy.
Not true. He doesn’t have to pay state income tax which averages about 4.5 %, but tgey have other taxes in Texas as well as federal taxes.
Not even worth considering
ETA: States and Provinces with high tax rates obviously have many public benefits that non income tax states have, so that has to be worth something
Why would Dallas trade him now?Even if you absolutely adore Marner, you'd have to be interested in a Marner for Rantanen trade
Haha indeed, that rings a big bell. I believe the quote was even more LOL than that, is was something like Rantanen without MacKinnon is worth 5 million "at best".There were people earlier in this thread calling Rantanen a $5M player without Mackinnon. No exaggeration, no hyperbole.
Because they could have a Mitch Marner.Why would Dallas trade him now?
Avs had no issue moving him, what were they not seeing?Mitch is a great player but I’m having a moment of quiet reflection tonight imagining a Matthews, Knies, Rantanen line.
Well, let’s go with the ones that brought us to the dance. Come on Mitch, this is the team they say you’ll wilt against. Prove em wrong.
Neither player is available at the moment. How do you not know that?Because they could have a Mitch Marner.
He pays federal tax but no state income tax, however he does pays other taxes like county, school etc. Once again, if Marner wants to play in Ontario he is obviously fine with the tax situation and all the benefits associated with those taxes. so he should not be asking for a higher percentage of the cap.This has been went over a million times. Dallas pays like 38% tax. Toronto like 54%
1.) all of his signing bonuses are taxed at 38%. He didn’t get full sb I don’t think
2.) He gets 50% of his salary plus at 38% instead of 54%.
The road games they would be taxed similarly.
Facts are facts. I thought Marner got overpaid in comparison to rantanen last time.
But 12.5 state tax free isn’t the same as 12.5 in Toronto.
Marner also shouldn’t get the same as rantanen dollar for dollar as he scores less goals and points.
I think they felt like they couldn’t afford him and Makar long term. If i may ask, in your opinion, what do you feel is a fair estimate for Mitch Marner’s new contract?Avs had no issue moving him, what were they not seeing?
He would consider 12m a pay cut.Mitch's contract ceiling is $12Mx8
Full f***ing stop no debate. In a perfect world he's not making what Rantanen makes.
Between Nylander and MatthewsI think they felt like they couldn’t afford him and Makar long term. If i may ask, in your opinion, what do you feel is a fair estimate for Mitch Marner’s new contract?
Agreed. Would've been nice if Mitch had a hankering for playing in Carolina though. Knies Matthews Rantanen would've been a sight to see.Neither player is available at the moment. How do you not know that?
He pays federal tax but no state income tax, however he does pays other taxes like county, school etc. Once again, if Marner wants to play in Ontario he is obviously fine with the tax situation and all the benefits associated with those taxes. so he should not be asking for a higher percentage of the cap.
The bar is set and if he wants 12.5 he has two weeks to earn it. That’s pretty darned generous considering he has lived up to his current contract.
Possibly for sure.Agreed. Would've been nice if Mitch had a hankering for playing in Carolina though. Knies Matthews Rantanen would've been a site to see.