Player Discussion - Mitch Marner, Part 3758391849 | Page 37 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Player Discussion Mitch Marner, Part 3758391849

Status
Not open for further replies.
Does Knies tie it up without Marners impact? No one thinks he had a dominant night, the criticism as always goes over the top.
As a line, Matthews could bring a little more. Marners 7 points in 4 games is pretty impactful.
He had a bad night.

Its okay to acknowledge it. I promise you wont combust. Knies made his goal all by himself.

If Marner (and Matthews, to be fair- not just singling one out) had proper impact, the series would be over.
 
Opinions are opinions, maybe I just watched it completely wrong and have no idea what I'm watching. I saw a top line fumble a lot of pucks, a lot of passes no nowhere, and f all for sustained Ozone pressure. Team went down 2-0 early and was chasing.
I did miss the first few minutes still in Europe. Really liked the second and third. I do find with the pace a lot of fumbling, but seems both teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IPS
I don't understand how it's even remotely a controversial take that Marner had a poor game last night.
It shouldn't be controversial at all.

A byproduct of Marner being made the scapegoat the last several years, is that now we see the opposite - many going out of their way excessively praise performances that arent good enough.
 
It shouldn't be controversial at all.

A byproduct of Marner being made the scapegoat the last several years, is that now we see the opposite - many going out of their way excessively praise performances that arent good enough.
Why though in a game where nylander was the most “impactful” all I saw was complaints and inna game where marners looking like playoff Mitch Hes getting praised for things Hes not doing
 
Jesus Christ... I know corsi is kind of outdated now... but these numbers are pretty eye-popping...

1745768181422.png


1745768209927.png



These stats seem to corroborate the observation that the top line is spending a hell of a lot of time in its own end and not much in the opposing team's. At least they're defending decently in the defensive zone and not conceding a lot of goals.
 
Jesus Christ... I know corsi is kind of outdated now... but these numbers are pretty eye-popping...

View attachment 1024008

View attachment 1024009


These stats seem to corroborate the observation that the top line is spending a hell of a lot of time in its own end and not much in the opposing team's. At least they're defending decently in the defensive zone and not conceding a lot of goals.
Where would the first line be without Knies heroics?

Isn't it unrealistic to expect a first line to actually have 3 first line players? And if we do have 3 first line players, why aren't they producing a hell of a lot more outside of the PP?
 
Where would the first line be without Knies heroics?

Isn't it unrealistic to expect a first line to actually have 3 first line players? And if we do have 3 first line players, why aren't they producing a hell of a lot more outside of the PP?

I get they're not playing Keefe hockey, but I don't think you can keep getting outshot as badly as they have been and have sustained success.

They need to transition the puck better and create more in the offensive zone.
 
Jesus Christ... I know corsi is kind of outdated now... but these numbers are pretty eye-popping...

View attachment 1024008

View attachment 1024009


These stats seem to corroborate the observation that the top line is spending a hell of a lot of time in its own end and not much in the opposing team's. At least they're defending decently in the defensive zone and not conceding a lot of goals.
Where’s the top half I don’t see Willy on here
 
Where would the first line be without Knies heroics?

Isn't it unrealistic to expect a first line to actually have 3 first line players? And if we do have 3 first line players, why aren't they producing a hell of a lot more outside of the PP?
Theyre playing great defence let’s focus on the second line with holmberg on it and a banged up Willy clearly
 
Where would the first line be without Knies heroics?

Isn't it unrealistic to expect a first line to actually have 3 first line players? And if we do have 3 first line players, why aren't they producing a hell of a lot more outside of the PP?

in playoff this season

% of production in pp of some NHL player with leafs core
Matthews 80%
M. Tkachuk 75%
Barkov 67 %
mackinnon 60%
Tavares 60%
marner 57%
kempe ( actual pts peader 56%)
Nylander 50%

Who's care where you producing, only thing people remember is if you producing and winning and nobody care about anything else
 
Jesus Christ... I know corsi is kind of outdated now... but these numbers are pretty eye-popping...

View attachment 1024008

View attachment 1024009


These stats seem to corroborate the observation that the top line is spending a hell of a lot of time in its own end and not much in the opposing team's. At least they're defending decently in the defensive zone and not conceding a lot of goals.

By "not conceding a lot of goals", you do mean have conceded 0 goals right?

As far as outcomes go, they have been maybe the best top line in the playoffs. No need to dig into corsi to try to hate on them. I do notice that there has been a great discovery of certain analytics among certain people lately that had previously attacked them as made up.

5v5 goal differential % for Leafs players:

Marner: 100.00
Matthews: 100.00
Knies: 100.00
Holmberg: 100.00
Tanev: 80.75
OEL: 79.81
McCabe: 76.16
Tavares: 75.89
Nylander: 75.89
Benoit: 66.41
Rielly: 57.69
Carlo: 50.89
Robertson: 49.36
Jarnkrok: 48.19
Lorentz: 48.19
Laughton: 48.19
Domi: 40.13
McCann: 34.32
Patches: 0.00

Top lines need to keep it up and bottom lines need to be shuffled to fix the issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad