Generalsupdates
@GeneralsUpdates on Twitter
- Sep 4, 2017
- 7,674
- 4,926
After 2 goals and only 4 points in 49 games, I dont think many teams are lining up for a 2003 born with that kind of lack of production. If you're a good team, you don't want a forward with 4 points in 49 games in your top 9. If your a bad team, you want younger guys getting the playing time not a 2003Chisholm was at Montreal’s development camp and was listed as a standout in an article I read on NHL.com. He needs playing time, so hopefully a trade is in the works for him, otherwise he will get buried in the lineup. Hate to see him leave the fish — him and Veccia are the only forwards that play a heavier game.
Edit; looking at your recent posts "03HockeyFan" you seem to spend a lot of time trying to convince the Montreal forum that '03 Chisholm is actually good lol. Not this again.....