MessierThanThou
Registered User
Look, I'll dumb it down for you.
We both think Skinner is a problem. My solution for the upgrade is to replace him with a competent goalie. But that will also likely increase your payroll (cap) by about 2-3 million. You have to pay for what you get (Campbell excluded).
We already have a competent backup who is NOT the problem and comes at the tidy cap hit of 1 million. Salary aside, he's been one of the better backups this year. If you remove him, as you suggested, for a Skinner upgrade/competition, and keep Skinner, now you're adding 4-5 million to a team that's already pressed up against the cap. Pickard may not be the ultimate "solution", as you've consistently said, but removing cheap pieces that are playing well, is akin to getting rid of a cheap but top performing penalty killing 3rd liner because the first line winger is not doing his job.
Yeah...so you don't even know my opinion, don't even know that I've actually argued pretty much exactly what you're arguing leading to and on deadline day, and yet still insist that I want to replace Pickard and not Skinner (even though I said more than once that they're on a similar level but one costs 1.6 times as much as the other).
You're just talking to yourself here.
Last edited: