Miscellaneous NHL Discussion CXI: The Last One Went So Long Because I Didn't Know What The Next Number Was | Page 51 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Miscellaneous NHL Discussion CXI: The Last One Went So Long Because I Didn't Know What The Next Number Was

I was scrolling Reddit yesterday, and came across a few obvious troll/hater posts about NHL rules, but honestly? There were some fun ideas in there. I think the NHL rules are dumb and stiff as they are, and they are in the entertainment business, so why not entertain? The regular season drags forever with too many lulls.

So... a few interesting ones...

1. Let the President's Trophy winner choose their 1st round matchup.
2. Win a game? 2 points. Win two games in a row? 3 points. Win 5 in a row? 5 points. Make streaks worth something. Playoff races would be way more interesting.
3. Have something like a shot clock in OT. Can't play keep away for more than 30 seconds.

Those were the three best... maximum chaos. I'm all for it. Lean in to being an entertainment product - they're all plastered with ads and sponsors anyway, so why keep pretending there's any kind of integrity to the game?

This post brought to you by PowerThirst. It comes in new flavours like Bear and GUN.
 
I was scrolling Reddit yesterday, and came across a few obvious troll/hater posts about NHL rules, but honestly? There were some fun ideas in there. I think the NHL rules are dumb and stiff as they are, and they are in the entertainment business, so why not entertain? The regular season drags forever with too many lulls.

So... a few interesting ones...

1. Let the President's Trophy winner choose their 1st round matchup.
2. Win a game? 2 points. Win two games in a row? 3 points. Win 5 in a row? 5 points. Make streaks worth something. Playoff races would be way more interesting.
3. Have something like a shot clock in OT. Can't play keep away for more than 30 seconds.

Those were the three best... maximum chaos. I'm all for it. Lean in to being an entertainment product - they're all plastered with ads and sponsors anyway, so why keep pretending there's any kind of integrity to the game?

This post brought to you by PowerThirst. It comes in new flavours like Bear and GUN.

I like #1. Wonder how many PTWs would get knocked off by bad teams who play pissed off at the disrespect
 
I like #1. Wonder how many PTWs would get knocked off by bad teams who play pissed off at the disrespect

The "chosen" would definitely have some extra motivation to knock them down a peg.

I could see a problem with a PTW selecting an out of conference opponent, for travel / scheduling purposes.

The idea of awarding extra points for winning streaks, to me, makes it infinitely more interesting to watch. Winning that 4th game in a row is much more meaningful.; And breaking someone's winning streak has much bigger consequences. It's no dumber than awarding an extra point for playing 65 minutes instead of 60, and giving the loser a consolation prize.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE
I was scrolling Reddit yesterday, and came across a few obvious troll/hater posts about NHL rules, but honestly? There were some fun ideas in there. I think the NHL rules are dumb and stiff as they are, and they are in the entertainment business, so why not entertain? The regular season drags forever with too many lulls.

So... a few interesting ones...

1. Let the President's Trophy winner choose their 1st round matchup.
2. Win a game? 2 points. Win two games in a row? 3 points. Win 5 in a row? 5 points. Make streaks worth something. Playoff races would be way more interesting.
3. Have something like a shot clock in OT. Can't play keep away for more than 30 seconds.

Those were the three best... maximum chaos. I'm all for it. Lean in to being an entertainment product - they're all plastered with ads and sponsors anyway, so why keep pretending there's any kind of integrity to the game?

This post brought to you by PowerThirst. It comes in new flavours like Bear and GUN.
I'm good with 1, don't see the point (so to speak) of 2, and am all in favour of 3. Alternatively, implement a no back court rule in OT: once you cross red line / enter offensive zone, you cannot carry the puck out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flyersnorth

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad