Like, I know - wasn't that just a few weeks ago?
But I still think my frustration from 2018 (and really - I was talking about something from 2017) was warranted, because I just went through the exact same thing in evaluations two weeks ago.
My club, and several others (but not all) start evaluations by doing a series of timed skating drills. Forward skate, backwards skate, pivot, and weave through cones with a puck. Those times then become the starting point of where kids are tiered, which then gets adjusted up and down after some scrimmages.
So I like the fact that it's 100% impartial - skate times don't lie. It doesn't matter what tier you played in the year before, it doesn't matter who your parents or siblings are - if you blow the doors off in the timed skates you're in the top group.
But there's a difference between doing good writing a test, and between actually knowing the material. You can be a great hockey player (and fast too) but if you don't perform well in 1 10 minute span of time you can be moved way down. Similarly you can be a great skater, but not a good hockey player, and get pushed up way too high.
I'll never know, but in part I think that was to blame for my youngest quitting hockey. We put him in a camp or two and he turned in really good skate times. He therefore got placed in a really high tier - which was not where his ability or desire was. So at the start of the year he wasn't touching the puck, then just got discouraged, and it was a whole downward spiral from there.
But anyways, two weeks ago - I was again out there trying to help coach for the skating drills. And I could see some kids really knew what to do, while others were struggling - not with skating or hockey itself, but just with the damn drills. And these weren't even my kid's age group - I was just volunteering.