Minnesota Wild General Discussion 2024-25

[DigitalBoldy]

Öhgren - Rossi - Zucc
Boldy - Ek - Khus
Foligno - Freddy - Trenin

Ohgren - Rossi - Zucc
Boldy - Khusnutdinov - Hartman
Trenin - Ek - Foligno
Lauko - Gaudreau - Shore

Ahhh yes, let's put Ohgren (15pts per 82 game pace) and Khusnutdinov (8pts per 82 game pace) in the top 6. That seems like a great idea.

 

[DigitalBoldy]

The point is that this shouldn't happen

Those should all be virtually 0

Yesterday he started on a line with Foligno and Hartman, and Trenin was moved there in the third period. That should never happen.

FFS, we should have kept Evason if this is the line of thinking. He loved keeping the top line together while we all pissed and moaned that the line was stale and never changed. Now we have a coach that changes the line and we have people pissing and moaning that they aren't keeping the top line intact every game. This board needs to pick a lane.

 

[AKL]

FFS, we should have kept Evason if this is the line of thinking. He loved keeping the top line together while we all pissed and moaned that the line was stale and never changed. Now we have a coach that changes the line and we have people pissing and moaning that they aren't keeping the top line intact. This board needs to pick a lane.

It just takes a little bit of critical thought. Just a tiny bit.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

FFS, we should have kept Evason if this is the line of thinking. He loved keeping the top line together while we all pissed and moaned that the line was stale and never changed. Now we have a coach that changes the line and we have people pissing and moaning that they aren't keeping the top line intact every game. This board needs to pick a lane.

We don't deserve good offensive centers if it's this controversial to say that you think they should always play with other good offensive players. That's my lane, I picked it a while ago, and I don't think I've strayed.

 

[Prior]

We don't deserve good offensive centers if it's this controversial to say that you think they should always play with other good offensive players. That's my lane, I picked it a while ago, and I don't think I've strayed.

When do we get see these good offensive centers? That seems like it would be fun.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

When do we get see these good offensive centers? That seems like it would be fun.

Rossi is good.

 

[Spurgeon]

Ahhh yes, let's put Ohgren (15pts per 82 game pace) and Khusnutdinov (8pts per 82 game pace) in the top 6. That seems like a great idea.

They’re comfortably in a playoff spot, mixing up lines for a few games isn’t going to hurt them. It’d be nice to get an idea of what could potentially work as an alternative in a playoff series.

Do you think they’ve been an offensively good team with what they’ve been trying?

 

[north21]

Ahhh yes, let's put Ohgren (15pts per 82 game pace) and Khusnutdinov (8pts per 82 game pace) in the top 6. That seems like a great idea.

Does anyone other than ohgren deserve a shot in the top 6 right now? At least he is showing some flashes.

 

[NHL1674]

Lines today.....not to beat a dead horse, but Trenin gets moved up, and........we're just gonna keep going with what hasn't worked?

Now Rossi gets to deal with Mojo on the 3rd line. Make it make sense.

 

[MNRube]

Lines today.....not to beat a dead horse, but Trenin gets moved up, and........we're just gonna keep going with what hasn't worked?

Now Rossi gets to deal with Mojo on the 3rd line. Make it make sense.

Should be

Boldy-Rossi-Ohgren
Foligno-JEE-Trenin
Mojo-Freddy-Zucc

 

[BagHead]

I'm not sure I view that as Trenin getting moved up. The order he has those lines in is suspect.

 

[NHL1674]

Should be

Boldy-Rossi-Ohgren
Foligno-JEE-Trenin
Mojo-Freddy-Zucc

It's certainly an improvement.

 

[DigitalBoldy]

They’re comfortably in a playoff spot, mixing up lines for a few games isn’t going to hurt them. It’d be nice to get an idea of what could potentially work as an alternative in a playoff series.

Do you think they’ve been an offensively good team with what they’ve been trying?

No no no, haven’t you heard? Any variation that doesn’t start with Boldy-Rossi-Zucc is simply outrageous.

If you disagree, then I will insult you with “lacking critical thought” and that you “don’t deserve offensive centers.”

Excuse me while I go back to delete old posts about irrelevant things like stale lines and how Zucc is terrible.

 

[NHL1674]

No no no, haven’t you heard? Any variation that doesn’t start with Boldy-Rossi-Zucc is simply outrageous.

If you disagree, then I will insult you with “lacking critical thought” and that you “don’t deserve offensive centers.”

Excuse me while I go back to delete old posts about irrelevant things like stale lines and how Zucc is terrible.

I don't want Zucc in that equation or even on the top line, honey.

 

[NHL1674]