Minnesota Wild General Discussion 2024-25

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Spurgeon is still a vg D... very smart. He has started to lose a bit of speed, but not a lot... he's still an asset when on the ice. The problem is that there are signs of him starting to break down, that he has one of the biggest cap hits on the team, and that his #1RD role has been supplanted by Faber. 7.5M is a lot to pay for a 2nd pairing D, albeit a good one.

We can live with keeping him around for another two years, but given our projected D roster in the next year or two, you would certainly have to consider moving him in exchange for a similar forward, with a similar cap situation.
 
Spurgeon is still a vg D... very smart. He has started to lose a bit of speed, but not a lot... he's still an asset when on the ice. The problem is that there are signs of him starting to break down, that he has one of the biggest cap hits on the team, and that his #1RD role has been supplanted by Faber. 7.5M is a lot to pay for a 2nd pairing D, albeit a good one.

We can live with keeping him around for another two years, but given our projected D roster in the next year or two, you would certainly have to consider moving him in exchange for a similar forward, with a similar cap situation.
Pretty much summarizes exactly how I feel.
 
Nah, it’s only if someone wants Spurgeon. I’d be open to retaining cap if it ups the value return.

It seems there's a severe lack of interest. On HF anyway, I'm sure there'd be slightly more interest from real GMs.
 
Is there a single player on our team that has had good historical playoff numbers?

No, which is why the "Fiala doesn't show up in the playoffs" argument was always weird to me. He was exactly on par with Kaprizov and Zuccarello, ahead of just about everyone else.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad