Proposal: Minnesota/Chicago Pick Trade

[keppel146]

I’m sorry but MN does not need to be acquiring mid round picks. That’s the last thing we need. We need top 10 and top 15 picks. Not more 2nd and 3rd rounders—we already have enough of those and look where they’ve gotten the team.

 

[rynryn]

I’m sorry but MN does not need to be acquiring mid round picks. That’s the last thing we need. We need top 10 and top 15 picks. Not more 2nd and 3rd rounders—we already have enough of those and look where they’ve gotten the team.

well we could bundle them for a higher pick I guess.

 

[Digitalbooya]

I’m sorry but MN does not need to be acquiring mid round picks. That’s the last thing we need. We need top 10 and top 15 picks. Not more 2nd and 3rd rounders—we already have enough of those and look where they’ve gotten the team.

I generally agree, but if you have 5 guys in the same tier then it could make sense to move down. I doubt any top 10 picks are moving for #13+

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

Today I learned that the 34th pick is a mid-round pick.

 

[MK9]

Today I learned that the 34th pick is a mid-round pick.

Imagine your surprise when you learn that asparagus makes your pee smell weird(er).

 

[keppel146]

Today I learned that the 34th pick is a mid-round pick.

People were mentioning the Wild acquiring 50 or 72. That’s a mid round pick.

 

[MNRube]

People were mentioning the Wild acquiring 50 or 72. That’s a mid round pick.

I don’t consider either a mid-round pick. Especially 50. That’s a 2nd

 

[keppel146]

I don’t consider either a mid-round pick. Especially 50. That’s a 2nd

Sure that’s fair. The original point being we already have a deep enough pool of average prospects, and adding one 3rd round pick is unlikely to become a franchise changing trade. When we could just keep 13 or trade up in the 1st /2nd.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

Sharks move up from #14 to #11 and give up #42.

Nice baseline established maybe.

 

[AKL]

Sharks move up from #14 to #11 and give up #42.

Nice baseline established maybe.

That would seem to lend more credence that the cost to move from 18 to 13 is just 34, like you originally proposed.

 

[Dr Jan Itor]

That would seem to lend more credence that the cost to move from 18 to 13 is just 34, like you originally proposed.

Yeah, maybe we add a 4th or future 3rd or something, but I think it would be pretty close.