Rumor: Mikhail Grigorenko Arbitration Numbers
- Thread starter mcpw
- Start date
strictlyrandy
Registered User
They'll likely settle at 1.1 or close I think. Avs shouldn't scare this one off. He's a good player.
is he though?
I honestly don't know cause I haven't seen him play much in the NHL. I was surprised to see that he has only played 140 games.
He turned 22 in May. The kid has a long time before people can decide if he's a bust. He played a lot better last year and hopefully with more responsibility can turn into a solid top 6 player for years to come.
IWantSakicAsMyGM
Registered User
He got rushed in Buffalo and that killed his confidence. At the end of last year, he showed glimpses of why he was drafted so high. If he can keep his head on straight, there's no reason he can't be a very solid top 6 winger.
On topic, I don't think Grigorenko's ask is really that far off from what he's worth. If Yakupov is worth $2.5m, Grigorenko is easily worth $1.65m.
They should just meet in the middle.
He has talent beyond what you typically see from a 22 year old. Towards the end of the season when his confidence was on the rise, he was showing the hands and vision that got him drafted where he was.
This is kind of a big year for him. He should have tons of opportunities to break out. We'll see how it goes.
He has talent beyond what you typically see from a 22 year old. Towards the end of the season when his confidence was on the rise, he was showing the hands and vision that got him drafted where he was.
This is kind of a big year for him. He should have tons of opportunities to break out. We'll see how it goes.
SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
I think most people that haven't watched Grigorenko and just looked at the draft position and his Jr. Numbers will be looking for him to put up a lot of points. From what I've seen of him, he's actually a pretty good defensive zone player, and his offensive game is coming around. With him, it's all about rebuilding that confidence, he was rushed a bit into the NHL and the things he was used to doing just didn't work anymore. We started to see towards the end of the season what he was capable of.
I think it would be smart for both sides to settle around 1.2-1.4/year for 2 years. It's a good deal for the Avs and it's a bit more security for Grigorenko.
I think it would be smart for both sides to settle around 1.2-1.4/year for 2 years. It's a good deal for the Avs and it's a bit more security for Grigorenko.
AvsGuy
Hired the wrong DJ again
Give the kid a 2 year, $3 million deal. If he can't prove more within 2 years, then that's all she wrote.
tigervixxxen
Optimism=Delusional
We like him in Colorado. It's a slow process but he works hard and does a lot of things well. Very smart and talented player.
Supposedly he's close on a contract so this one shouldn't make it to Friday.
Supposedly he's close on a contract so this one shouldn't make it to Friday.
McPhatty00
Registered User
I really had high hopes for this guy. Darcy/Rolston didn't help him. I was a little bummed to see him go. He's the ONLY player that Armia ever played well with.
- Dec 2, 2007
- 17,401
- 2,413
How's it catching up to him? He did well this year in limited minutes, producing when he was playing with offensively gifted players outside the 4th line. He also worked hard defensively to earn his minutes.
It's probably for the best for him to be on the Avs, he's comfortable with Roy and there aren't any high expectations for him. All the Avs want to see is for him to steadily improve year over year.
You just don't know what you're talking about.
IMO, he was better (or more effective) than Iginla for majority of the games, but tell me one coach in the NHL who would promote him to replace Iginla? It just isn't going to happen until Iginla is gone after this season.
Was the QO to Grigerenko a two way deal? Can't imagine how he justifies anywhear near 1.65M.
Anywhere near 1M is more than fair for him. Can't imagine this actually goes to arb.
Anywhere near 1M is more than fair for him. Can't imagine this actually goes to arb.
IWantSakicAsMyGM
Registered User
Yakupov is getting $2.5m. Grigorenko scored at essentially the same pace (2 pt difference over 82 games).
Not saying Yakupov deserves $2.5m, but using him as a comparable, Grigorenko at $1.65m is a steal.
AINEC*
AINEC
- Jul 4, 2011
- 7,332
- 2
mouser
Business of Hockey
Most likely yes, it would have been a 2-way QO. Grigorenko didn't hit the thresholds to have a mandatory 1-way QO.
Yakupov has shown he can produce at the NHL level (31 pts in 48 games in his rookie year)..whereas Grigerenko really hasn't. Not sure how Grigerenko could use him as a comp
Kobe Armstrong
Registered User
- Jul 26, 2011
- 15,726
- 6,682
Except for the fact he might really be 24?
turned 22 in May.... psh, the May of his draft year maybe
http://flamesnation.ca/2012/6/20/mikhail-grigorenko-why-is-he-falling
There is something off about the kid. His talent relative to peers keeps going backwards. I think he could play at the NHL as a third or four line to-way player but that would mean revamping his game. I don't see it. Sabres knew it. Gamble for Avs was minor -- he was least important part of deal for O'Reilly in my opinion. If they can turn the kid into 3rd line player, deal will look much better for them.
