I am not just talking about me, if this were pre-2005 no know would care, now it's about being able to put together the best roster within the number.
Shall I put it simpler for you? For what he is making, he isn't worth it.
How about you stick to one criticism instead of jumping for one point to the next to try and win an argument?
If you had said he isn't worth the bang for the buck originally, we wouldn't be having this dialogue because I agree 100%. $5.75 million per season should net you at least 55-60 points per season, but that's not what you said that I disagreed with. You said he's playing terrible. He isn't. He's playing below what he should be but he's far from terrible.
Another fact people should wrap their heads around is what Fishhead said:
Played in conference finals 5 times.
Played in cup finals 3 times
And of course won 2 cups.
To add to that list:
Richards has won a Memorial Cup (Kitchener Rangers - Jr A), World Juniors (Team Canada IIHF), Calder Cup (Philadelphia Phantoms), Olympic Gold (Team Canada), Stanley Cup (Los Angeles Kings), Prince of Wales Trophy (Philadelphia Flyers) and Clarence S. Campbell Bowl (LA Kings). Based on the triple gold winners, he is the only player to win a Championships at Jr (CHL Memorial Cup) Minors (AHL) Professional Stanley Cup (NHL) and at Olympic and World Championship Levels (IIHF and IIHF World Juniors).
You don't get THAT lucky. You have to be a part of that. Yes, being on a good team is key of course but you have to be a key part of that good team to win that much and he has been, whether it is on the scoreboard, in the faceoff dot, in the locker room, whatever. Mike Richards is a winner, through and through. He's won EVERYWHERE he's been. You don't get rid those guys. His play may be down but his leadership and proven track record inspires the rest of the team to be that much better.