Estimated_Prophet
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2003
- 11,160
- 12,400
Savard is a RHD
I got myself turned into a pretzel there.....thank you!
Savard is a RHD
It will be interesting to see if any/some/all of Barron, Guhle and Harris make the team. If Edmundson goes to the right then Guhle and Harris will be competing for a spot behind Savard and Matheson with Schueneman.
Maybe Harris moves to the right where he played at Northeastern......
Does not seem ideal but there is still alot of time. I have to wonder if Hughes doesn't try to move Savard for a RHD with a similar contract.
I don’t know about losing Poehling. I’ll need to think about it more. But Petry was gone. Everyone in the league knew Habs hands were tied. I’m happy we get a D Matheson’s caliber to put in his place.
Totally a younger lower case Petry.
Seems like Matheson and Savard are set up to bring the other young D along. I don’t see them both playing together.I got myself turned into a pretzel there.....thank you!
I think people are remembering quotes about Matheson when he was a joke four years ago and basing their opinion on that.
He's improved a lot and could be a good piece for us. His metrics aren't bad and he played behind Letang so never got real offensive opportunities. He will get Pp1 here cause we have no options.
Nice to get another gars de chez nous to get to play for the hometown team!Another West Islander.
Howpfully pans out better than Leblanc for us!
Wideman will be the 6th-7th defenseman and I doubt he will get to play on the first wave of the powerplay again even tough he had a good finish to the season. How many goals on the powerplay for wideman? Zero. Not so much of an option on a healthy roster.Wideman exist
Lol
Man! He has a great shot and the guy can skate !Lol Poehling Petry Matheson all on the ice when MM scored versus Montreal
Yeah I’ve been looking up on him and he was sheltered a bit, not sure why he was sheltered though. At least he seriously drove possession so he should be able to face tougher opposition.I heard that he's fun to watch but was heavily sheltered in PIT, could lead to disaster if he's exposed. Perfect fit for us.
I like him he is a good second pairing dmen and will surprise a lot of people here.
People seems to forget that Petry’a best season offensively before coming to Montreal was 27 points.
In the right role he could put up 40-45 points.
Anyway we are tanking and he is still young for a dman still has a good 5 years left.
Hughes represented him, must think highly of him.
28 is still young for defensemen, and often when they actually start learning defense. If he doesn't progress, well, what we have is already a 4.9M$ defenseman, if you look at the market....hopefully he'll progress as a player while helping the tank with his Petry-like defensive brainfarts...a win-win...
A younger Petry, who makes less money.....and from Montreal to boot.....seriously guys, we did want some cap space, we got it and have a Dman to help with the kids on the back end.Watching his highlights he looks like a Petry clone out there. My initial reaction to the trade was disappointment, but I’m definitely willing to give this guy a chance.
Welcome to the club Mike.