Mike Bullard

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Is finishing Top 10 in GPG once in his career elite?

I'm too young to have watched him play - and when I first heard of him I couldn't believe there was a hockey player with the same name as a talk-show host - but finishing Top 10 in GPG once and Goals twice doesn't strike me as elite.

That being said, you must be at least decent to outscore your next best teammate by 35 points. (Shedden did play 9 fewer games...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dingo
I only remember Bullard with Calgary in 1987-88, when he scored 48 goals and 103 points. Not surprisingly, almost half of his points came on the Flames' lethal PP, when he'd be up front with Nieuwendyk, and with MacInnis and Suter firing bombs from the point. But then he was weirdly useless in the playoffs, with 0 goals in six games before being speared by McSorley, which in retrospect ended his prime.

He had scored 51 goals on the dreadful Pens team the season before Lemieux was drafted.

I remember that he went to Philly during 1988-89 and 1989-90, when that club was starting to decline. 113 points in 124 games for them, so not too bad.

I have no memory at all of him being with Toronto in 1991-92.

Does seem a bit odd that he retired (from the NHL) then. (For reference, he's slightly younger than Gretzky / Messier.) Did he marry a Swiss or German woman or something? Looks like 11 or 12 years of playing in that region.
 
Selfish, one dimensional, and I believe struggled with substance abuse at points. More or less a bad team scorer. He had some skill certainly, but struggled to fit into the NHL team concept. If I recall, he didn't really challenge himself on the European leagues he jumped to either...
 
Mike Bullard was not elite. He was offensively skilled and could score, but didn't do much defensively or physically. He also had a reputation for being too individualistic and not using his linemates enough.

Many people thought Calgary would win the Cup in '88, instead they got swept by Edmonton.. After his 100+ point season, Bullard only had 1 assist and was minus-7 in the four game sweep. When Fletcher saw the opportunity to get Gilmour, Bullard was the obvious choice to move.

There were many skilled Canadian players in the 80s and 90s who had long successful careers in Germany or Switzerland when their NHL careers stalled, guys like Peter Lee or Dale McCourt. The pay was good and the seasons were shorter and less physically demanding than the NHL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Cannon PI

I only remember Bullard in Calgary. Decent player, definitely 1 dimensional. I mostly remember him for being impaled by McSorley. So I checked youtube to see if theres any interviews or podcasts.

It's not super good quality, I listened to it at 1.75 speed while doing other work.



12 mins he admits booze was his biggest problem. He said he's 27 years sober now because of his daughter.
@Michael Farkas was right about that.
48 mins, admits the penguins tanked for Mario Lemieux, says he usually never played the third period.
52 mins, says Terry Crisp hated him and Brett Hull
around 1:02 he started talking about the flyers run in 89 which was pretty interesting.
1:09 says his first move to europe was due to a contract dispute. Says going to switzerland hurt his game in Toronto and he picked up bad habits.
at 1:11:30 he said he got blackballed by toronto for partying. Went to Europe and partied more.


There's some other stories about the early 80s penguins if anyone is interested from like the 20-45 minute mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Cannon PI
48 mins, admits the penguins tanked for Mario Lemieux, says he usually never played the third period.

They might have been tanking and maybe he skipped some shifts here and there, but this is pretty easy to disprove - he scored 21 of his 51 goals that year in the 3rd period, which was easily his most productive period. He certainly wasn't 'usually not playing' and his memory might be a bit faulty here.

Generally speaking, Bullard probably belongs in the same category as guys like Rick Vaive. 1970s-style shooters who peaked as pretty elite goal scorers on bad teams (and didn't mind mixing things up physically either), but who had poor off-ice habits and conditioning and little/no attention to detail defensively who kind of got left behind by the short shift revolution and general 'professionalization' of the game in the late 1980s/early 1990s and were pretty much toast as effective NHLers by the age of 30 or so.

It's always been crazy to me that a team as bad as the 83-84 Penguins had a 50-goal scorer on their roster. Even as a little kid looking at hockey cards, I was like 'how is this possible?' when Bullard had almost as many goals as Mel Bridgman (NJ's leading scorer that year) had points.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad