which is why i suggested stamkos or at least something around stamkosIf he had say just 1-3 yrs left some would take thr risk. But he has FIVE YEARS.
Montreal needs a 2nd line center.
Didn't they already say no to him earlier this year?
I was thinking mika for joshua.
Though Montreal makes the most sense here.
Probably something like Anderson and a 2nd for Zib with some retention like 1.5m or so.
It’s not going to be a pretty deal either way. Large issue is going to be the NMC. Not many teams will be in a better position to win, and be in more of a destination while being willing to take on the risk and send some salary back to offset the risk.
Isn't Laine making more than Zibanejad? Montreal might be a decent fit if they cannot add a younger 2C. Realistically, a younger 2C will cost a significant value in assets while Zibanejad will be much more reasonable. If the only thing adding him to MTL costs is a second and a B prospect and his cap hit that's not terrible for MTL. Not ideal but they aren't getting a 2C that fits the profile they'd like to add for anything close to that.He'd be VERY low on my list for a 2C from a Montreal POV, but you can at least see the need and Zibanejad potentially waiving his NMC for Gorton.
It sounds like Montreal wants to go younger than 30s at C and they've been very against the idea of offering term to veterans in Free Agency, so I'm pretty skeptical. The retention would be a necessity, there's no way they can have Zibanejad have the highest forward cap hit.
Though Montreal makes the most sense here.
Probably something like Anderson and a 2nd for Zib with some retention like 1.5m or so.
It’s not going to be a pretty deal either way. Large issue is going to be the NMC. Not many teams will be in a better position to win, and be in more of a destination while being willing to take on the risk and send some salary back to offset the risk.
He's been on decline at 5v5 for two straight years and he turns 32 in a week. Not near the mobility he used to have. That contract might be the worst in the league. Any GM that takes him should only be doing so by unloading one of their own massive liability contracts.Possibly but that was before he started to play better and the Nucks realized how rough it will be to obtain a 2C...........Still think it's pretty doubtful but I would at least be open to exploring......
Isn't Laine making more than Zibanejad? Montreal might be a decent fit if they cannot add a younger 2C. Realistically, a younger 2C will cost a significant value in assets while Zibanejad will be much more reasonable. If the only thing adding him to MTL costs is a second and a B prospect and his cap hit that's not terrible for MTL. Not ideal but they aren't getting a 2C that fits the profile they'd like to add for anything close to that.
He's been on decline at 5v5 for two straight years and he turns 32 in a week. Not near the mobility he used to have. That contract might be the worst in the league. Any GM that takes him should only be doing so by unloading one of their own massive liability contracts.
He'd be VERY low on my list for a 2C from a Montreal POV, but you can at least see the need and Zibanejad potentially waiving his NMC for Gorton.
It sounds like Montreal wants to go younger than 30s at C and they've been very against the idea of offering term to veterans in Free Agency, so I'm pretty skeptical. The retention would be a necessity, there's no way they can have Zibanejad have the highest forward cap hit.
Everybody wants younger than 30s for every player. Montreal has the assets to make something happen, but how many under 30 players are going to be available this offseason? Some have been speculated, but in terms of speculation only probably 5% minus the trade deadline of guys speculated are ever moved.
I think if Zibinajed is moved it'd be later after some of the centers are traded in UFA and I don't think the Rangers will love the deal.
Habs will not take that contract, term would kill them and they are not stupid. Hutson, Demidov would need big extensions. Team would be a contender in 2 years and nobody needs anchor contract in the contending period.Isn't Laine making more than Zibanejad? Montreal might be a decent fit if they cannot add a younger 2C. Realistically, a younger 2C will cost a significant value in assets while Zibanejad will be much more reasonable. If the only thing adding him to MTL costs is a second and a B prospect and his cap hit that's not terrible for MTL. Not ideal but they aren't getting a 2C that fits the profile they'd like to add for anything close to that.
Had a BRUTAL start to the season but been back to his old self second half of the year having 37 points in 43 games since Jan 1. 2C who plays a fairly sound defensive game.
Rangers wanna ship out a lot of guys this summer, and mika is at the top of the list. Who would be a reasonable trade partner?
And lets do the real life proposals, not the HF, “hes worth nothing and you need to trade 5 1sts with him”.
Yep and Zib won't be that guy.Montreal needs a 2nd line center.
That's fine, but he's also just not a great fit for what Montreal needs or wants from a 2C in the present.
Like I'd expect there'd be interest, but unless the deal makes sense it could also be Montreal saying **** it, lets try to address it internally if literally every other reasonable option falls through.
I can see montreal wanting to push competitively as well. Which would mean that the Habs woudl avoid Zib like the plague.Hard to address something like that internally especially if Montreal wants to take advantage of the ELC years for Demidov/Hutson.
Can see them wanting to push being competitive pretty quickly.
They understand that the real window starts with guys like Reinbacher, Fowler .... They will not be a contender with Matheson, Monty...Habs either look for longterm solution or 2-3 years stop gap. Zibanejad is none of that.Can see them wanting to push being competitive pretty quickly.
They understand that the real window starts with guys like Reinbacher, Fowler .... They will not be a contender with Matheson, Monty...Habs either look for longterm solution or 2-3 years stop gap. Zibanejad is none of that.
It doesn't make any sense. In fact, Zibby's contract and high risk of continued decline could stop Montreal from seriously competing due to cap constraints.There are probably 6 or 7 teams looking to do that same thing. Questions going to be how quickly would each team like to accelerate it.
I'm not trying to endorse that I think Montreal would be gung-ho on doing it. I just think it makes a lot of sense from the outside looking in.
Habs could probably push the bill on something else if they're willing to part with some good pieces. Either way I don't see anyone looking to come out of this offseason with a center feeling comfortable about the asking price or the risk of the player.