Mid-Season Report Card

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Disappointments - Nash, Stepan, Hank, AV, Delzotto, Girardi, Boyle
Come to play every night- McD, Dorsett, Kreider, Zucc, Strals
Pleasant surprise- Cam Talbot
Overall team deserves an F, not winning at home is inexcusable
Trade- If Ottawa is stupid enough Delzaster and a low pick for Methot
 
One can make a case that the forwards should be graded a D or maybe even an F considering that this team has been ranked in the bottom 5 offensively for most of the season.

Maybe Zipay could have ranked special teams a little higher, but I am ok with the B-. The PP has improved but it is still inconsistent - those 2 shorthanded goals surrendered against the Isles over a week ago, 0-for-5 against the Devils and 0-for-6 against Tampa on the PP in November, etc.
 
If Stralman gets a C+, what do the other defensemen, sans McDonagh, get? Z's?

Only because of lower expectations - thinking about it more, I'd probably give Girardi a D+, Staal a D, Moore a D+, and Del Zotto an F. Yes, the defense has been that bad, and I feel Stralman has lived up to expectations the MOST out of these, but that's not saying much, considering he's been quite lackluster as well.
 
I can't speak for everyone but Moore has been one of my favorite rangers this season because he is noticeable even in his limited minutes. He may not be putting up points like he has in past seasons but three of his four points have been in the last seven games and I think it will pick up as the season goes (he did miss an entire season last year so it's reasonable to expect a curve I think). I personally like him more than Boyle because he is just as good on faceoffs, but more so he's more creative. He's definitely a smarter player, he skates better, he's surprisingly effective on the rush, he can pass make plays. Boyle might have more points but I see Moore creating more offense. He rushes the puck well can stick handle, makes good passes, knows when to chip in, and never just shoots it into the goalies chest from above the circles like Boyle regularly does. He drives the net and seemingly everytime there a scramble in the other team's crease he and/or Dorset are involved. In any case if the knock is his offensive output, I'm not on the same page. I see him creating offense as a fourth liner and short handed even if his points don't reflect it at the moment.

I actually find Boyle more creative than Moore (and that's not saying too much). Moore reminds me of guys like Rico Fata, Manny Malhotra and Lauri Korpikoski - fast guys who can get noticed because they're faster than everyone else, but are missing something in their skillset that lets them convert their chances into anything tangible. Moore SHOULD be more creative than Boyle.

This year, the Rangers have paralleled the teams from the 1999-2004 era - during those years, I was always forced to listen to our announcers tell us what a "great effort" we were getting from some of the lesser home-grown players - guys like Moore, Malhotra, and yes, even Niklas Sundstrom and Mike Knuble, who were brought in, and, because their skill set never reached it's potential (with the Rangers, not in general), were representative of how awful this team was at drafting (or at least developing) talent. Freddie Sjostrom, although not homegrown, was like this as well (as was Jed Ortmeyer). Of course the one guy everyone complained about NOT noticing - Marc Savard - turned into a star. You always "noticed" the intangible players - they just never helped the teams in tangible ways.

And now, here were are again, a flawed mediocre team in a bad division, on the verge of falling off the proverbial cliff should our schedule get ANY more difficult (it does - the last 15 games have 9 road matchups), and once again, guys like Dominic Moore get a free pass because their hustle is noticeable. Dubinsky was noticeable many nights- but also gave us 40+ points. Fedotenko, Prust, and even Avery were not only noticable - they put some points on the board along with the intangibles.

This book feels the same again - I am annoyed with Sather for bringing Moore back. He should follow the advice of the GM across the river - you pay someone based on the VALUE they bring - that can mean paying a 3rd liner $4 million if they truly bring that value to the team or paying your franchise goalie. It can also mean letting a player go if they cost too much. Moore is making $1 million, whereas his production could be replaced by many minor league players making half that. We need more offense - we cannot afford to waste roster spots, even 4th line spots, on guys who produce zero points. But I'll save anti-Sather for another day.
 
Last edited:
Grades? Worst Ranger team I can remember. Zero passion, zero intensity.

Final grade: F

Making the playoffs would hurt the team more than it would help.
 
Wow...

Yet to me, it still feels like a party in the sand compared to 1998-2004.

Ugh. Kevin Hatcher. Alexander Daigle. Jeff Toms. I always liked Nedved and Kovalev, though..and the Gretzky/Lafontaine team was insane on paper. Otherwise totally agree.

Rick Nash, who missed significant time with a concussion, is fighting it offensively and defensively, with just six goals in 22 games and one in the last 10. Centers Brad Richards (no goals in the last nine games), Derek Stepan (two in the last 16) and Derick Brassard (one in the last 12) have been wildly inconsistent. Hard-luck captain Ryan Callahan has been unable to stay healthy and already has missed 14 games. On the positive side, Chris Kreider's nine goals and 12 assists in 32 games have put him in the rookie-of-the-year conversation, Zuccarello (25 points) is playing with grit and purpose and at $1.1 million has been a bargain. Speedy Carl Hagelin, who missed the first 10 games of the season recovering from shoulder surgery, has nine goals and been increasingly dangerous. There has been alarmingly little finish from the second-tier players.

That last sentence is a bit weird, considering the rest of the paragraph. He names three second-tier players that have been finishing (Kreider, Zuccarello and Hagelin). Then he calls them out.

Maybe he's just admitting that Brassard, Richards, Nash, Stepan and Callahan are second-tier players. I don't know. Somewhat confusing.

Though if you're counting cap-dollars, those are literally the Rangers' five best-paid forwards. They make a total of $21,941,667 this season. 1/3 of the total cap. For the team's best guys to play the way they're playing is just inexcusable. It's like two straight years of ultimate suck from the absolute top players.

The reason why we're always desperate for "secondary scoring".
 
Somebody said last week all Boyle has to do is put his skates on the right feet for several people to claim he had a good game. 2 goals last season. 1 goal this season and he gets a B grade? He must have tied his own skates also lol.

I'm sure whoever said that was the type that complains about him every shift and then blatantly misrepresents his accomplishments by being too lazy to look up his non offensive stats.
 
I'm sure whoever said that was the type that complains about him every shift and then blatantly misrepresents his accomplishments by being too lazy to look up his non offensive stats.

-Center Brian Boyle shattered his stick against the boards after a turnover and lost battle at the boards on consecutive sequences. He’s been a valuable penalty killer, but Boyle has struggled mightily this season in most other phases, particularly in the offensive end.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...carello-skip-practice-staal-works-on-conditio
 
I actually find Boyle more creative than Moore (and that's not saying too much). Moore reminds me of guys like Rico Fata, Manny Malhotra and Lauri Korpikoski - fast guys who can get noticed because they're faster than everyone else, but are missing something in their skillset that lets them convert their chances into anything tangible. Moore SHOULD be more creative than Boyle.

This year, the Rangers have paralleled the teams from the 1999-2004 era - during those years, I was always forced to listen to our announcers tell us what a "great effort" we were getting from some of the lesser home-grown players - guys like Moore, Malhotra, and yes, even Niklas Sundstrom and Mike Knuble, who were brought in, and, because their skill set never reached it's potential (with the Rangers, not in general), were representative of how awful this team was at drafting (or at least developing) talent. Freddie Sjostrom, although not homegrown, was like this as well (as was Jed Ortmeyer). Of course the one guy everyone complained about NOT noticing - Marc Savard - turned into a star. You always "noticed" the intangible players - they just never helped the teams in tangible ways.

And now, here were are again, a flawed mediocre team in a bad division, on the verge of falling off the proverbial cliff should our schedule get ANY more difficult (it does - the last 15 games have 9 road matchups), and once again, guys like Dominic Moore get a free pass because their hustle is noticeable. Dubinsky was noticeable many nights- but also gave us 40+ points. Fedotenko, Prust, and even Avery were not only noticable - they put some points on the board along with the intangibles.

This book feels the same again - I am annoyed with Sather for bringing Moore back. He should follow the advice of the GM across the river - you pay someone based on the VALUE they bring - that can mean paying a 3rd liner $4 million if they truly bring that value to the team or paying your franchise goalie. It can also mean letting a player go if they cost too much. Moore is making $1 million, whereas his production could be replaced by many minor league players making half that. We need more offense - we cannot afford to waste roster spots, even 4th line spots, on guys who produce zero points. But I'll save anti-Sather for another day.

We may just have to agree to disagree because I'm not looking at his effort or hustle as greater than Boyle's. Simply put, I watch Moore making smart decisions and making plays. I don't look at his numbers and his production as the same. I can think of three or four excellent passes he made that had the other player converted, he's tied with Boyle in scoring. From what I watch, I'm not worried about his production and I think it will pick up as it has of late. I also think that if more of our lineup starts picking up their production, that our fourth line as a whole will follow suit.
 
Stepan gets a D- from me. Really annoying watching him floating and smirking. He's this year's the New Gomez.

I don't blame Nash, 3 concussions in 1 calender year. Missed by inches having his career ended 1st by Testito and then Ovechkin. Nash may even be playing through a bit of a fog after getting punched by OV. Have to wonder about his hockey sense since he said the Rangers were a team he'd accept a trade to. Apparently nobody among his people is much of an historian.

I agree. What is more frustrating to me is how so many people on these boards supported him holding out through training camp over a nominal amount of money. Yet those of us who were worried about its impact on his season were chastised. I lost a lot of respect for Stepan after what happened in training camp and I have lost even more considering how poor he has played this season after a hold out.
 
Yep. Anyone who says this is the worst team wasn't following the sport then.

Ive been watching the Rangers since 1993 when I was 5. Ive been following them religiously since 1998. Ironic that I started following the team during the dark ages. What you said is completely correct. There are NO comparisons.
 
Ive been watching the Rangers since 1993 when I was 5. Ive been following them religiously since 1998. Ironic that I started following the team during the dark ages. What you said is completely correct. There are NO comparisons.

Yep. Those dark ages were horrendous. I don't even feel bad for anyone *****ing and moaning about today's team if they didn't go through that crap.
 
I thought he was generous. Far too kind to the Rangers.

Goaltending - B- (agreed, might be more in line with a C+ though)

Coaching - D+ (AV refuses to adapt his game and appears clueless)

Forwards - D- (almost an F, Richards, Nash, Callahan, and Stepan have all been underwhelming, when four of your top six forwards aren't meeting expectations, you can't be at a C)

Defense - D+ (McDonagh and Stralman are the only one's playing well, Girardi's game has regressed even more than it did last year, Staal started terrible, was improving and got injured, Del Zotto, Falk, and Moore are all terrible defensively).

Special Teams - B- (agreed, PP is much better, but still far too inconsistent).
 
Yep. Those dark ages were horrendous. I don't even feel bad for anyone *****ing and moaning about today's team if they didn't go through that crap.

Ok, Post the starting lineup for the team you would consider to be the worst Ranger team. I'm honestly curious.

Perhaps I should've wrote " one of the worst " Rangers teams I can remember. (Fan since '86 , because that seems to matter.)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad